Re: [regext] Internationalized Email Addresses and EPP

Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com> Tue, 24 November 2020 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <pm@dotandco.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CBE3A0EB9 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 06:39:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.19
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dotandco.com header.b=KfC+urat; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=jjlKHaSB
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lVCistuSyKoU for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 06:39:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B2353A0EB7 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 06:39:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA87F57 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:39:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap22 ([10.202.2.72]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:39:12 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dotandco.com; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=91DOLDFBC07qT4ZX4gfcQtn00ndHHdK ob6Vzf3AFgaY=; b=KfC+uratuOhSTtDAQy8drvv3whnIYJ8uOJ8PxdqgtZdy6H/ KSbXuyEK4D2Uz5aVMxNnPC4pzfTH7svntCpJxmsmMsSav156a7FLRwme8DUxq1NX pRCTnOhsUYvcCSiCZ9M8+K533OlBD4Vh89o42gqPH6AdmQW/ZWdZ27BUGytmz+6a F6gNLIzkY9dOVFj52DybYb8YliQeAErkbKwDSNzEVdG20JVUNovLlV40bc/TvsY5 1bh1RN0mGD1OwMj5T6Ak6Yg9g2ofxLOoSy5tOK8DYre6aSup/dWFwzVXSVQ/TAOC dWKYbEXuYsobgy39z1TBryGhP+cQLdQDvU9nsqw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=91DOLD FBC07qT4ZX4gfcQtn00ndHHdKob6Vzf3AFgaY=; b=jjlKHaSBhnz3FSXF/jmRhg 5Ws6lUJaYlVdQyTxVx/UH0btUdvUv88nHoGuZvBJkZlENzRbrWMcPGqDbVIs6+4K 4UaP+j4g3m8eIIKhBGXLd4mRb8fuHej3cK3S4mRjHVJmK+hqDmde3oNYKZmUDqr+ mePiJeF0R1D9TT2e1sZWiPj0FfqBZ0t0kGlhaOYtp3Zd9uh005FhUE+tJgrSohJU EoRSVkx1P9pTpTgAJE7nYmzeLNPtN5URCqE0ZkQRjFf/p/4V35YPoZv6tkcBGYMX PYvvVTGv1PpE2uOlGfZPb8YZHRNt4DgBghXHjBQWWALwsmq3kywRNkW4pd4ZIzOw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Dxu9X_hTSL4jrJYlpRn4sz-CE2lMWiw7VHkc9JLN_zij06uzdRxOHncWxgU> <xme:Dxu9X8Cs0sCbNtsYlydUMiF4-RuE5GYmNW4sRSjjN5Knu3jRTaxwA7IFnpT09Sc0Y pc7IEM42C8NDn8WLQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudegkedgieejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfrfgrthhrihgtkhcuofgvvhiivghkfdcuoehpmhesugho thgrnhgutghordgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugfffieehffejkeduhfdvke evffdufeeuieekheeuffejfeejieetieehudfgkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt necurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpmhesughothgrnhgutghordgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Dxu9X_FlSBnWzAEdPyl3ZDgxtv4GntUd4ZQC3rslodqyAPPtF3tMRw> <xmx:Dxu9X8RZeQw1b7Tc8Dtq5M_Hk5JrqGTQxowgms-nGyZjAQL0gYQIBg> <xmx:Dxu9X8wURUtXyXdJ730nSld-BEfKP4iq82EHw5uSbh-32EMm0SuvcQ> <xmx:Dxu9X79FoiqgLHK7YUwxiy-lyJfYdfvz7ZUQIVlZ4HCgIxbjUcSOOw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2D7946680078; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:39:11 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-622-g4a97c0b-fm-20201115.001-g4a97c0b3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <e966f941-0e27-455b-8ec9-2fece08dc89a@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51B48D19-5CF0-4C66-90AB-729306A860A7@academ.kiev.ua>
References: <20201123205504.4A58627C7661@ary.qy> <a23d4ff1-9fd9-4a28-90fd-5a91585d846b@www.fastmail.com> <5DC2CF4B-CDF5-4641-80D0-9D2D1DDAB11F@academ.kiev.ua> <83b02e81-b3e8-472c-a483-1e90f25ac8cb@www.fastmail.com> <F43E92F0-E27D-4BB7-ABFE-9BA3BF436329@academ.kiev.ua> <b1fdf05b-141e-47f2-b93a-7d29e9fa33be@www.fastmail.com> <51B48D19-5CF0-4C66-90AB-729306A860A7@academ.kiev.ua>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:38:50 -0500
From: Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com>
To: regext@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/KMAFYl7jG-jmrdd7uSQXJ-VXB50>
Subject: Re: [regext] Internationalized Email Addresses and EPP
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:39:17 -0000


On Tue, Nov 24, 2020, at 02:19, Taras Heichenko wrote:
> Two notes:
> - the authinfo field in a Contact object allows opening personal data 
> to only one registrar

So... domain:authInfo is not good enough to authenticate the owner to do the transfer...
but contact:authInfo is good enough to retrieve contact data and then authenticate the owner
to do the transfer.

"Interesting". 2 authInfo but seemingly one has more "power" than the other.

Also:
"to only one registrar": no, to any registrar having this token. Exactly like
domain:authInfo allowing transfer to any registrar having it.

> - it is not registry policy, it is the registrar's agreement

[..]

> I just wanted to say that if a registrar cannot handle the 
> internationalised email of new
> customer it will lose new customers and this situation force it to fix 
> its EPP.

So then why should a registry force anything? We are back at the fact
that registrars wanting to support that scenario will indeed need to put
resources for it, and hence if there is an EPP extension to support that
they will implement it.
The question is how to do it in a smart way to not disrupt all other
registrars NOT wanting to support this scenario.

-- 
  Patrick Mevzek
  pm@dotandco.com