[regext] Re: RESTful EPP draft next session how to move forward

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <[e-mail]>]

Thanks, that helps. For some reason the DataTracker returned no results when I searched for “restful EPP”.

Scott

On Jul 23, 2024, at 10:01 AM, Maarten Wullink <maarten.wullink=[e-mail]> wrote:



Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


Hi Scott,

Sorry i forgot to include a reference to the draft, you can find it here.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wullink-restful-epp/<https://secure-web.cisco.com/16xqFKzukctZDxpzu89dLLHGVTj_3_M0sI5A-XZ89nexM3cHIB-7u73qVFJ0kaBngzudSqNz4OHMVtzTURuhKJHYCzobagpr8UahThiQJzXePkvRXc1XN79EMqcSJbbH_q-nOGKKb60bFDKB86-nq6ANOle0Ht_AC3GPNRmtvw51Co0DRCBx4zDpV3603ovMWQ1tr8LPoOVbG4BcBRguuLHRraRuO66kHlSLVhxo7cCzvvrPtDU-OlUM0eL1YHohaaAUKK-WHwyCvzGWknJVR1ORrN40M1fr_yxBP47qLypNGORKvmLDCdf3WfLz89wQb/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-wullink-restful-epp%2F>

-
Maarten


Op 23 jul 2024, om 07:03 heeft Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck=[e-mail]> het volgende geschreven:

-----Original Message-----
From: Maarten Wullink <maarten.wullink=[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2024 9:59 PM
To: Registration Protocols Extensions <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] RESTful EPP draft next session how to move
forward

Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.

Hi All,

During the next REGEXT session on Wednesday we will be asking the WG
where to best continue to work on RESTful EPP (REPP).

There was broad support for this work during previous sessions and on the
mailing list and by other communities such as CENTR (centr.org
<http://secure-
web.cisco.com/1yR7AbWi_bLjoECIPto4bCW8jg5e4TpW2sOzLzzXVBZiEsJ-
NZ8_czhrKU3ysMaudfEkrNP62UW_DmQQ5TCmaF3dNFkcI7JL6e6vnGY8Zjgs
3uXT3_R7nZJMCerzAR8KvZqoVH9K9PSDFsx8FElmyC41vl6hRiI4BwjCsBbxOI5
GSGNRm-
8JFVDPn82HPsKr25vRjdnzXeJlCDuIIyE5wtrJTfhqKiX711nhbtoa1fiS6mxB6TqZ
0bEkDI0GPSRSnNG9Vr2NJ0EuRtSJVQmzkQwvDBUTv-
jJRupRMczoPPn4/http%3A%2F%2Fcentr.org%2F>)
But, some have also expressed the opinion that REPP is not an extension nor
transport protocol, but instead something new.

The current draft is not fully compliant with RFC5730 ( e.g. statleless vs
stateful) but does have a goal of full compatibility with the existing object
mapping and extensions.

[SAH] I can't find an IETF draft that describes the topic. I did find this one, though:

https://sidn.github.io/ietf-epp-restful-transport/draft-epp-restful-transport.html

I'd very much prefer to base our working group discussions on a published IETF draft. Please publish one, or more, as necessary.

How to best fit formally fit this work into the IETF process?
We see 2 options:

1) WG to adopt this work?
- This is the preferred option
- Is it an extension (in a wider sense)?
 - Work on WG re-charter in parallel (if required)?


2) Create a new WG (NEXTGEN-EPP)?
- Focus on a next generation RESTful EPP?
- Cleaner and no distractions by work on EPP/RDAP extensions?
- But will be same people + more red tape

[SAH] We really, really need to see a draft (or drafts) to have a meaningful discussion of this topic.

Scott