IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] Fwd: Re: IANA Considerations in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search

Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it> Tue, 20 October 2020 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942643A0C17 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.145
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.145 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RN5COUXaY7Ky for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.iit.cnr.it (mx5.iit.cnr.it [146.48.98.152]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0E23A0C1F for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.iit.cnr.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103A1C0502; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:07:21 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx5.iit.cnr.it
Received: from smtp.iit.cnr.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx5.iit.cnr.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NhNHtoVzyFUy; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:07:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.12.193.108] (pc-loffredo.nic.it [192.12.193.108]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.iit.cnr.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 212F3C02D2; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:07:18 +0200 (CEST)
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
References: <d2c4accd-0182-57b7-6fbc-e63fd1aae2b9@iit.cnr.it> <b55a5f35-535d-68b5-b028-1eceb05df6a1@iit.cnr.it> <a9bb7be64dec49d78b98e0b6b5f85ab6@verisign.com>
From: Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
Message-ID: <f004154b-9fe4-ed93-ea24-c8760475d417@iit.cnr.it>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:03:54 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a9bb7be64dec49d78b98e0b6b5f85ab6@verisign.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------722AC2EDF8527688FF9FBDBE"
Content-Language: it
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/NgEjhj_N1jGArGCVHEsPR0dU5xA>
Subject: Re: [regext] Fwd: Re: IANA Considerations in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:07:27 -0000

Hi Scott,

Il 20/10/2020 15:00, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto:
>
> *From:* regext <regext-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Mario Loffredo
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 20, 2020 8:42 AM
> *To:* regext@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [regext] Fwd: Re: IANA Considerations in 
> draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search
>
> Hi all,
>
> as a consequence of last discussion about rdapConformance, I propose 
> to update RFC7483bis in order to clarify that rdapConformance in the 
> help response must be used to signal the conformances with all the 
> specifications implemented by the RDAP server. For any other response, 
> rdapConformance must provide only hints as to the specifications used 
> in the construction of the response.
>
> */[SAH] This makes sense./*
>
> Additionally, I wonder whether or not the rdapConformance values 
> should be returned according to the user profile. Does an RDAP user 
> really need to know about services that he won't be able to request?
>
> */[SAH] What user profile? There’s no such thing described in the 
> specifications./*
>
/*I was simply referring to what is described in 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7481#section-3.3
*/

/*Mario*/

> *//*
>
> */Scott/*
>
-- 
Dr. Mario Loffredo
Systems and Technological Development Unit
Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT)
National Research Council (CNR)
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
Phone: +39.0503153497
Mobile: +39.3462122240
Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email