[regext] Fwd: Re: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis
Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it> Fri, 25 September 2020 13:49 UTC
Return-Path: <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650B13A0E24 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 06:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Y4HfXtkQG8r for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 06:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.iit.cnr.it (mx3.iit.cnr.it [146.48.98.150]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010933A0E18 for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 06:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.iit.cnr.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1782760056B for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:49:27 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx3.iit.cnr.it
Received: from smtp.iit.cnr.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx3.iit.cnr.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Q7U9qBervTo for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:49:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.12.193.108] (pc-loffredo.nic.it [192.12.193.108]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.iit.cnr.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CFA86001D7 for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:49:24 +0200 (CEST)
References: <aaa27ac0-b9bd-cab1-056c-b54864712f3c@iit.cnr.it>
To: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
From: Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <aaa27ac0-b9bd-cab1-056c-b54864712f3c@iit.cnr.it>
Message-ID: <30507615-bb2f-8fc9-8a8a-4f24f9064815@iit.cnr.it>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:46:04 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <aaa27ac0-b9bd-cab1-056c-b54864712f3c@iit.cnr.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------02BB93884DC30D434E4292CD"
Content-Language: it
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/NvFkPmLeiZGMkL_EO22f_SpR8WA>
Subject: [regext] Fwd: Re: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:49:31 -0000
Hi folks, thinking about the document again, I have another feedback. The document does not contain any requirement or recommendation about when returning ldhName and unicodeName values. However, the examples seem to convey the idea that ldhName must always be returned and unicodeName must be returned in case of an IDN. Is it worth writing something more about this topic? Best, Mario -------- Messaggio Inoltrato -------- Oggetto: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis Data: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:49:18 +0200 Mittente: Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it> A: Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>, regext@ietf.org +1 Mario Il 18/09/2020 15:52, Antoin Verschuren ha scritto: > The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission to the IESG for publication as a standards track document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis/ > > This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 2 October 2020. > > Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple “+1” is sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this document by replying to this message on the list. > > The document shepherd for this document is Jasdip Singh. > > Regards, > > Jim and Antoin > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext -- Dr. Mario Loffredo Systems and Technological Development Unit Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT) National Research Council (CNR) via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy Phone: +39.0503153497 Mobile: +39.3462122240 Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo
- [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483b… Antoin Verschuren
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Tom Harrison
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Mario Loffredo
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Roger D Carney
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Gould, James
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Jasdip Singh
- [regext] Fwd: Re: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext… Mario Loffredo
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… James Galvin
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Mario Loffredo
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Jasdip Singh
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Antoin Verschuren