IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] rfc7484bis

Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Tue, 04 August 2020 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCE03A0C85 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 13:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=viagenie-ca.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pp3AeoJNPW-r for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 13:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf30.google.com (mail-qv1-xf30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90CB93A0BF5 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 13:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf30.google.com with SMTP id x6so13928612qvr.8 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=viagenie-ca.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Seh8CU5MnYuFN5J7pgBY2LUo8ueZShEtot4eHdiuIkQ=; b=fNO5nF+tl7IC6LFYaC3wJ/U/0MX6vMyMfbwKbEHs4Ogr0wmXTt1r93Kj6umhXmzGso HCCA64ESYeHMSzc2IyxMSVzufpGDxbw6lXhClY3iAkUGjk8iZaZNRo03Y/KqjkN/Yi4u En9Tf6XO7xJqvqsFnWcikrhe09cfD5eJSxhaecHYowfv+9oLzZITQDv7W/j6hG0QcF71 MvVHLoNxXczRDS9iIGYJI32GZHv5oa+/4jU66OwMvKhNXw1kBDZPqsGss5Jl73GsugEw urbFR6EfzCuHiaqP1ZoaoAeP8Cd0VvFPwoxmlvwxg+zUBJoan50V+x/havO6YE1x4CaL gS1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Seh8CU5MnYuFN5J7pgBY2LUo8ueZShEtot4eHdiuIkQ=; b=UVcuwGXlgjp8dmz+UvWTASfYz8mRCcRIatowD+RhlagSIGgGXYTlCnno9RLr6waiUy B93Kw38TN5csClmDj17gR37gT/UvV++suwA7DCC6m4Nt/+U8JpAhKb7Uxok/mjl7PbI0 vZ7PhChCjVhz+5h2Ib0/JI49PKgDph1haNVof5fq0OQPv2dLserFcFA5Gy/7pM4w5Qqh qPdLDd7+/PilwEJDNc26REWnd18l2WMF58KQ2T2LUBwPjPdpeig7rMPsaNicR01pVUlt P6cAACNPGnr1M6YDit1YFbX33m5Kl0yvG5bcglNntJrje5+2Alf4LB2Ex1AekarHtPL5 2CGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531hiDia93xiaOf7Nhazp1PeFKkrFD4k47O4xSfV8B+4U3/u5Fe/ 6dsejnD5XvlD+AiCCwxByx1gKyAEAL8miQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQ/KvgTwrZ+qhAIF+4KCOvs//WHBJnQaT53GBOWhjzs0XsDTxo//S5RGh7xnpWesfyyRP+tA==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e5c4:: with SMTP id u4mr230944qvm.109.1596574680489; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.115] (modemcable016.82-162-184.mc.videotron.ca. [184.162.82.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x12sm129366qta.67.2020.08.04.13.57.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
To: Gavin Brown <gavin.brown@centralnic.com>
Cc: regext@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 16:57:57 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <52564405-367B-4F38-9217-F0F443586269@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <801B9484-0F94-4CB4-ABBC-AAC495361E80@centralnic.com>
References: <801B9484-0F94-4CB4-ABBC-AAC495361E80@centralnic.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/OCh8veUpCxiWjlpHOsdrBIhmIk4>
Subject: Re: [regext] rfc7484bis
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 20:58:03 -0000


On 4 Aug 2020, at 15:32, Gavin Brown wrote:

> Hi Marc,
>
>> as Scott is updating RFC7482,RFC7483 for standard level, I’m doing 
>> the same for rfc7484. I haven’t heard major issues or major fixes 
>> to be made for rfc7484. I have a few wording fixes only at this time. 
>> There were some discussions on enhancing RFC7484 for other use cases, 
>> but never went far.
>> if anyone has a something to raise for RFC7484, please send me email 
>> asap.
>
> RFC 7484 doesn't provide any guidance for client implementers about 
> how to select a base RDAP URL when the services array contains more 
> than one entry. As a result I suspect that in this scenario different 
> implementations will behave in different ways, and users are at risk 
> of seeing different responses depending on the client they use.
>
> My suggestions are that:-
>
> 1. client implementers should be advised to prefer https:// base URLs 
> over http:// base URLs.
>
> 2. server operators should be advised that if multiple base URLs with 
> the same scheme are present in an entry, then all the RDAP endpoints 
> referenced by these base URLs must return identical responses (for the 
> same RDAP query).

good points. agreed. Will add.

Marc.

>
> Thanks,
>
> G.
>
> --
> Gavin Brown
> Head of Registry Services and Chief Innovation Officer
> CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC)
> https://www.centralnic.com
>
> Tel: +44.7548243029
>
> CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with 
> company number 8576358. Registered Offices: Saddlers House, Gutter 
> Lane, London EC2V 6AE.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email