[regext] [IANA #1398330] [Errata Verified] RFC9167 (7176)

David Dong via RT <iana-matrix@iana.org> Tue, 17 December 2024 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@iana.org>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6310DC18DB91; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 14:46:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mAASJ-DowM0C; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 14:46:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AE9DC180B70; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 14:46:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request7.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B47CE18C6; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 22:46:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request7.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 06C48C11D511; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 22:46:00 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: david.dong
From: David Dong via RT <iana-matrix@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <20241115214943.8FFA93B87C@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1398330@icann.org> <20241115214943.8FFA93B87C@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <rt-5.0.3-810165-1734475559-1929.1398330-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1398330
X-Managed-BY: RT 5.0.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: david.dong@iana.org
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 22:46:00 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: RUCQMEIUM735BVO2XPY5CHG7HZRM45CI
X-Message-ID-Hash: RUCQMEIUM735BVO2XPY5CHG7HZRM45CI
X-MailFrom: iana-shared@iana.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-regext.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: orie@transmute.industries, iesg@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, bortzmeyer@nic.fr, mail@tobiassattler.com, rcarney@godaddy.com, jkolker@godaddy.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: iana-matrix@iana.org
Subject: [regext] [IANA #1398330] [Errata Verified] RFC9167 (7176)
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions Working Group <regext.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/QLHiOaQ3dQyqUXA11w4yP_kICck>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:regext-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:regext-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:regext-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Orie,

This errata affects the Registry Maintenance Notification EPP Mapping Schema (https://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/schema/epp/maintenance-1.0.xsd) do you want us to update the .xsd file and add this errata as an additional reference to "epp:maintenance-1.0" in https://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/?

Best regards,

David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist

On Fri Nov 15 21:49:45 2024, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> The following errata report has been verified for RFC9167,
>  "Registry Maintenance Notification for the Extensible Provisioning
> Protocol (EPP)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7176
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Status: Verified
> Type: Technical
> 
> Reported by: Stéphane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
> Date Reported: 2022-10-21
> Verified by: Orie Steele (IESG)
> 
> Section: 5.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> 
> Notes
> -----
> XML Schema standard https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/ "The XML
> representation of schema components uses a vocabulary identified by
> the namespace name http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema. "
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9167 (draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-19)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Registry Maintenance Notification for the
> Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
> Publication Date    : December 2021
> Author(s)           : T. Sattler, R. Carney, J. Kolker
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Registration Protocols Extensions
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG