Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7482bis-02.txt

["Patrick Mevzek" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Scott,

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, at 10:45, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> This version of the document completes the updates for all known 
> clarifications and corrections. We may still want to add implementation 
> status information, so if you're an RDAP client implementor and you'd 
> like to help move this along your input would be greatly appreciated. 

I was under the impression, but I may be wrong, that "bis" documents should/can
have a section clearly outlining the differences they bring from the original
RFC they are a bis on, so that an implementer can see immediately which area
have changes. Is this not useful there or not relevant? Or will that happen
maybe later?

As for implementations, I guess I could add data about the RDAP client one from work,
(and hence many deployment experiences similar to what is outlined in
draft-blanchet-regext-rdap-deployfindings)
as I have not being able yet to release anything for my own free one under free time.
But not sure it would add value to the document. We can discuss that separately.


-- 
  Patrick Mevzek
  [e-mail]