IETF Logo Mail Archive

[regext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions-05.txt

"kowalik@denic.de" <kowalik@denic.de> Wed, 12 February 2025 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <kowalik@denic.de>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B1FC1DC813 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:14:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=denic.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XlDR_D-aEInc for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:14:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout-b-112.mailbox.org (mout-b-112.mailbox.org [195.10.208.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6835DC1DC802 for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:14:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-b-112.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4YtQ0D2QWmzDtJN; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:14:20 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denic.de; s=MBO0001; t=1739380460; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Pldu6QutsMGL0/o2gPAaUc+LzULmL8FsH4ngH7rEmG8=; b=PV0QEIeqLCi+r/yI4xm+YzcyweOBfX5iezqQKW9ASXhOQoeiIECTqKAD63s1pi7ofgIJPk YQqQp3ROJPgrwyIzMlEfdL2m3ktMBIn23F2imIqMtyvnmay9Yf2XWbsbAxsBe2XlMJNL0N /CjndS89U+gudm1OQbAEih/vImeRwqWdTeRKRVPBjYiNcdSeZ7jhaXCfyKj9jIcqAJZn5E x9XX1THYvcvuwvmmwNn6KQl9pKZxoYOM7ABhia4GfBRl2B6RVGPZr7uei7kk+t/sRHv7Xt ljfPovA8FxHvkOyzUA8d6Bb3VVfp8uuWkwTRx2QKDIbiXAWIdI9TITMiPW6ZQw==
Message-ID: <f11722d2-cb52-44b3-a3bf-1c82943dd8ba@denic.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:14:11 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "kowalik@denic.de" <kowalik@denic.de>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "andy@hxr.us" <andy@hxr.us>
References: <173878722078.433175.16116394455327843548@dt-datatracker-6f7f8bdd64-25rl2> <CAAQiQRfxSB_Yek4hoz9ysrOS3Gggb8XEv2omcxbq0o8fHxsJqA@mail.gmail.com> <23662957-72ec-482f-924b-b89b9dd75d08@denic.de> <CAAQiQRduuoNUdaPB-BGyQt5_yF6GHHfkCPVJrZMUd1odSXudDg@mail.gmail.com> <42f223d3-c1c2-44ab-9cdb-6a8d40481f90@denic.de> <CAAQiQRdOT0o_1nnme5qUvHp4sKj9LBvC3Z4DRBnXhsEXb=qJYQ@mail.gmail.com> <31d12658-eb3b-4ae3-85c5-703c64046855@denic.de> <6590447394584715a0a4d4acf417bfed@verisign.com>
Content-Language: en-GB, de-DE
In-Reply-To: <6590447394584715a0a4d4acf417bfed@verisign.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-512"; boundary="------------ms060808060002020200050607"
X-MBO-RS-ID: 969de1955e650f4514b
X-MBO-RS-META: 9zsb8phc5fpco5494x9u8bwb79mmhdyq
Message-ID-Hash: WZB3F54WJJLL3FMTPH7CYVU2UZX6BYJB
X-Message-ID-Hash: WZB3F54WJJLL3FMTPH7CYVU2UZX6BYJB
X-MailFrom: kowalik@denic.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-regext.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [regext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions-05.txt
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions Working Group <regext.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/U2BzTH-RxMBQnQ5Kojc_JTgqvmo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:regext-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:regext-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:regext-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Scott,

On 12.02.25 18:06, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>
> *From:* Pawel Kowalik <kowalik@denic.de>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2025 11:59 AM
> *To:* Andrew Newton (andy) <andy@hxr.us>
> *Cc:* regext@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [regext] Re: I-D Action: 
> draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions-05.txt
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> On 12.02.25 17:06, Andrew Newton (andy) wrote:
>
>         Allowing bare identifiers still leave the choice open for extensions which have a potential of generic use.
>
>     Why does requiring a prefix preclude generic use?
>
> Of course technically nothing, because syntactically a prefixed 
> identifier is also an identifier.
>
> On the other side, if an extension only wants to add one single path 
> segment /search/ what's good about forcing this extension to make it 
> /s_search/ just for the sake of making "s_" a namespace with one 
> single suffix in it?
>
> */[SAH] Because there’s value in consistency./*
>
[PK] True. In this case by introducing consistency we actually break 
consistency with existing extensions, some of them being RFCs. So I 
argue it's not worth it. It's not something that is broken that needs to 
be fixed.

Kind Regards,

Pawel

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status