IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response

Tom Harrison <tomh@apnic.net> Sun, 01 March 2020 23:49 UTC

Return-Path: <tomh@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2573A0C9E for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 15:49:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=apnic.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JurmS-JpLusR for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 15:49:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr1310082.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.131.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 153123A0C8C for <regext@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 15:49:51 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=dapkK06gRUTit3bSKr+zi9Qx9SV6GdYY3r3N9ImNzZTxRhPHF5WdeIoBXA/I/dEauMpPUXOGFJMzX3vZC5cdAdTL2j8tcx8ny9fa/nsV4wBQyv8cttIaDfJ7YYfaCoH+J0vvdoJUU7WJ7cIpOuHR47zjCqupQ4AH8PTehvF8L3r4e1a7akrUzfjPz4d6tAAs9W2hJny8dT8yBs0lX3N6VRiMmnKZ49tNIzwhrPpdmVyNE5+Je13l0I9Le8+1CFM1B5Ig6X6O8Ns1crFhyGIDGp1G0u0X6dvgoHmBJKjnGwg4mUHWZovSM9o8LWr4Pg6zI+Xc7uweig5AsfOpuC4NQw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=FqcggZ3QN7U7J+6Tq+9bZ1+nc7RbTIRx41a75+FXMZE=; b=nW+nMNEo+jTvQF+Qq3Hapmz2G9REL35jNqWPJqJgiP0htl1/+mMIuzadI/+g9+6vyzloK9gLoWp2XJQT6OXDr/5wt8LPaqkLDfyrDgePG5/OoTsorjHJnOj1AB8JKdvOY6ucaefuWpQQ1JmvkFpR/TuifiHzKhDouXnUFEu9GzBnTkVZefajcaX8gT2rTopeQK/ElTiQdBNyrdpGgpIDGoWNOOzpMqu/sCPbPz0hufvzzFa1HYUwubFFxKZVsh8wleh1IgWcmEdQK6NfWPDKSvEayaoqj4D7gb4uPYrD/KPq0o2yBb9lSz6C2jINd/EFURX4J7Emtk+X4NnheWG3xA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=apnic.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=apnic.net; dkim=pass header.d=apnic.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=FqcggZ3QN7U7J+6Tq+9bZ1+nc7RbTIRx41a75+FXMZE=; b=MgTahVz3XIBP+StykMiQv7Bp5/8qAHjUrroQQgqoKJRYrL7oeK7mYJU9g+A/j8XFWNoFNbzntpDGEq7W9KQgHZN8ReMQm2qt8B7slsM9wdTSu2w3Otq5G7/H47MsxpNvgO6TE78EcmlgXAbNzrJXUNhnfGCfzAO08Wab1tzqMu0=
Received: from PU1PR04MB2549.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (52.133.225.146) by PU1PR04MB2440.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (52.133.226.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.18; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 23:49:48 +0000
Received: from PU1PR04MB2549.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a530:aae1:6fc8:9c8f]) by PU1PR04MB2549.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a530:aae1:6fc8:9c8f%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2772.019; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 23:49:48 +0000
Received: from localhost (203.119.0.144) by SYBPR01CA0215.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:10c6:10:16::35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.18 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 23:49:47 +0000
From: Tom Harrison <tomh@apnic.net>
To: Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
CC: regext <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response
Thread-Index: AQHV7kV9NcUYDsCIxUSAoJe2f0T4X6g0a52A
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2020 23:49:48 +0000
Message-ID: <20200301234943.GH5595@tomh-laptop>
References: <CF2EE8CE-DB07-4AFF-84D0-B80BA5E76D39@antoin.nl>
In-Reply-To: <CF2EE8CE-DB07-4AFF-84D0-B80BA5E76D39@antoin.nl>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: SYBPR01CA0215.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:10c6:10:16::35) To PU1PR04MB2549.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:803:33::18)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=tomh@apnic.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [203.119.0.144]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7ef44782-3732-4365-3031-08d7be3b3a13
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PU1PR04MB2440:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <PU1PR04MB24401DE94AA536672ED6C44BC0E60@PU1PR04MB2440.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0329B15C8A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(7916004)(396003)(39830400003)(376002)(346002)(366004)(136003)(189003)(199004)(186003)(16526019)(6916009)(26005)(33716001)(9686003)(64756008)(66476007)(66446008)(66556008)(86362001)(71200400001)(4326008)(81156014)(81166006)(1076003)(316002)(4744005)(5660300002)(33656002)(2906002)(6496006)(508600001)(52116002)(966005)(8936002)(956004)(8676002)(6486002)(66946007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:PU1PR04MB2440; H:PU1PR04MB2549.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: apnic.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: juFSma/tZtJGHB6Pp+Cf0qiuD0G+5pQlyD0h0tp7vE9Q5mzhH+robEUFa9GUbOlU1ApikbmsZPE8l8I4KvsoBZE/ojVt594dtDLmlml+4OdCNP1DXMWAU/ipKF7bAm6/6HjpOr1N/Vpypkx/I+xQmg==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CA65121ED3414E4DA31BCB92747A97F9@apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: apnic.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7ef44782-3732-4365-3031-08d7be3b3a13
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Mar 2020 23:49:48.5836 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 127d8d0d-7ccf-473d-ab09-6e44ad752ded
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: uhiNlXIiVN0s3osEuMC2Fqw0rcqHEAbc/0x56jPAVIDEyPXjvug8dXRCF9LfYPrS
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PU1PR04MB2440
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/XP-09-rJxTF-4d0J2hoZcufZ8Hs>
Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2020 23:49:59 -0000

Hi Mario,

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 03:43:32PM +0100, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
> The following working group document is believed to be ready for
> submission to the IESG for publication as a standards track
> document:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response/
> 
> This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 13 March
> 2020.
> 
> Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple “+1”
> is sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this document by
> replying to this message on the list.

One extra comment: Section 4 has 'RDAP providers are RECOMMENDED to
include a "self" link in each field set other than "full" in order to
allow clients to easily request for the full objects'.  This could be
interpreted as meaning that the server should omit the "self" link
when returning a "full" field set.  I think it would be good if this
could be reworded to avoid ambiguity (e.g. by striking the text from
"other than" onwards).

-Tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email