Re: [regext] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer-06: (with COMMENT)

"Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com> Wed, 21 April 2021 16:03 UTC

IronPort-SDR: kudPxAfqH8Hch5B+bQ/Pga3eA/xyIedeDPShc4SkEjILUO/jRqWCekC8OwKVxrmjc1i/jy+GHj UHrE3xIAGFVebAgmxfvzRlJIZfdK8I7EBAteEqzfZd40KRX0ciMJNt7vjwheMgbZ/5XKc1gCbp dTowAO71qH4kGRJTbEhRZYXKGP81eerP6a+m1GeZ1kmUt8EU2c6yQvvEdsgn67ZrLfl2tkp83N FsLSqurV1VInpW2x9IYom4vMBeom9UWOnbLzPa34RdP3+vcrLoYSHyKIgwkEkqxzDa2tRjMYg9 bY0=
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:nEfxS6zgvAT9yK2mZF4EKrPwu71zdoIgy1knxilNYDZSddGVkN 3roe8S0gX6hC1UdHYrn92BP6foewK4ybde544NMbC+GDT3oWfAFvAB0aLOyyDtchefysdzzq FlGpIRNPTVLXxXyfn3+xO5FdFI+ra62Zulj+vf0HthJDsCA51I1RtzCQqQDyRNNWp7LKc+fa D82uN34xStfngNZtm2Cz0vT4H4y+HjpdbDbQQdDxAqrCuDnVqTgoLSIly90g0FWz1ChY0+93 PI+jaV2oy4v+qlxgTn22jf0pRTlLLaoed+OA==
From: "Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com>
To: "francesca.palombini@ericsson.com" <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer@ietf.org>, "regext-chairs@ietf.org" <regext-chairs@ietf.org>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>, "jkolker@godaddy.com" <jkolker@godaddy.com>
Thread-Topic: Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer-06: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHXNsfT5ze6l3FXfEG4ABq0uNRrUQ==
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:03:10 +0000
Message-ID: <104ED34A-C5AA-4DCE-BC6B-8E5628D44322@verisign.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.47.21031401
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <BB6D2CDBED78A049B6A08BD170FD7029@verisign.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/aI8NKLHDICtVP1Ku4HXyFP6_MLE>
Subject: Re: [regext] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer-06: (with COMMENT)
Precedence: list

Francesca, 

Thanks for the review and feedback.  Good catch on the copy/paste issue in section 5.2.  The first paragraph will be removed, since the second paragraph contains everything of the first with additional content.  

Thanks,

-- 
 
JG



James Gould
Fellow Engineer
jgould@Verisign.com <applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgould@Verisign.com>

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/>

On 4/20/21, 10:35 AM, "Francesca Palombini via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

    Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer-06: No Objection

    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)


    Please refer to https://secure-web.cisco.com/1REIya3_2eBEP2D-BRm17ZAqceIPtjYhppxsod_kyljnVM7h1u0Ksr9yjutCW2s0gaGLGDviIiP3PjOvPCjPnJSVt0uRdx6FrDcYK0NeYllgpdiGbW1VQwvjhzvmMNwXKI7J4y04_s8iK3aYxsnLLKzjl68RJ12VAJE0_z_bGrb192acEmb03fFQLeusOeG_xMdkF9gwMEfK8OdLLDPjR-gueq9KkB_y3xkUPXxAHtnLAZCQY3wjm0NJHuQ-1rQYs/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fiesg%2Fstatement%2Fdiscuss-criteria.html
    for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://secure-web.cisco.com/187BFcZg4bBS-o7ktiGOGtlb2Aq3av0Ozfg_XsYlkXEwFxsTMzglOS-K5p-UY-HsN0dch19uXC7RvXUbHTEVotJkXx-yEMB6yD6P_n57hrtbhJovDcGIzZXsHI-pjggKol2Z9UvF5fTurK0fTeZ4hR7eVMj4ku9t4ON3fHJr4LKXWBKJWwZdDyk4gkhICuWkktipjEgvR0pHKLTT93vgAiGHCP1vU7S4gQeC0ZD7vpiDS5lVilziVfj_g_j04vYeh/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer%2F



    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thank you for the work on this document. Also thanks to the shepherd Jody
    Kolker for explaining in the shepherd write up why this has been brought
    forward as std track, and doing the necessary XML checks. I only have one minor
    comment below.

    Francesca

    1. -----

       For an update command, the registry MUST allow for the setting and
       unsetting of the authorization information.  The registrar sets the
       authorization information by first generating a strong, random
       authorization information value, based on Section 4.1, and setting it
       in the registry in the update command.

    FP: Curious case of copy-paste of this entire paragraph in Section 5.2.

[regext] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on dr… Francesca Palombini via Datatracker
Re: [regext] Francesca Palombini's No Objection o… Gould, James