IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] Implementations of draft-wisser-registrylock?

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 07 April 2020 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2153A09A4 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 10:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTFdB8zW3eGB for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 10:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x331.google.com (mail-ot1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 190723A0966 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 10:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x331.google.com with SMTP id 60so992755otl.12 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 10:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=s1Ppx+leX8E14v2RoTFCPnqVqSRR1+Z5csGX8dDTAp0=; b=tbmxCxV6+0a6gnl24KHULoIAg4A6FUtYqjKFf6YEInuwbvc852VpIUGT77nXi/6HgT 2Sd8mUENQMqfWYkRz4FVYt08GWiRfZsnh+4HXTvtJ6zo6wnOk85fqCuKA318xXoKDNZe de2JeIXFCbi3Lk19WFGNLcbxz6GXjeP9/esBOFG7Bd+2viEhMGXq9y+NOtHII5DuorTT KkcUTH9p6OB0xFl5BWQdR3Re2176jSw2fosALn4I4olWd79zE/vlcLqWTxeC3FqfnFE3 yYTq5vTMcjnJME3o0lE5W4nz1E72Xy6HV1gBoiLI89URSkmdGrHKPqoARNJcMJo7aDCU nydg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=s1Ppx+leX8E14v2RoTFCPnqVqSRR1+Z5csGX8dDTAp0=; b=DGouqmvWK34nQINFEET7EL8eQOJOuJIdy79KJbiXEqMl8JrMCI6+4LoPlAKLO5ljdq Et4n/y5SOzkx5CYSPtMFuvV8BQowcGWrXqfN/5bNwex+mZSQwdBVpxCHgqH93Mjn+EtP VtMbbA++SMS/E2L1PmFE7wXhlDBnvEEAliwFNHo6HzCh7hwtvKnWRdMTJ8Sq4XY0TE7x l+oiCSNYIqGG4WHe7ZYL5bQjtdc+wcllfE4dOOj7wlvuhdums/qb3l93/DirayFFOCEm YFPhGgaaEZAmVh0EzCMQfcHRB7Xlyy8BaggQtkJF1OdrvLgRue9SoK8yOxFR9axZTi5b WhBQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pub3GRslD1/L86COpJ/2QnzZkaYC0WBpDspc6I3IgAkhCO7Luhsj WsEH1SB4d6vZOeWqOEjGYByZtUCuCt+tJ5gafI+Tr+jJq04=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLTGipZAX3JOpIWW+kpnLS9lKMqxPJuKjDOiQes3EUNHfNVTNRkdvl8D1IJyMEF7NEaA9R99amB8A2lohRlehA=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1988:: with SMTP id k8mr2603181otk.4.1586279178354; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 10:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE075B24192F8@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <20200327094413.73386d66@nbbrfq.loc> <CAJ9-zoWU3JMdvGMRKzOy4HWnZ0wDqO-Z83sNm2qADPNKiX0pBg@mail.gmail.com> <0b5331a907a34efbbfe1cc1873404a7d@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <0b5331a907a34efbbfe1cc1873404a7d@verisign.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 13:06:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+FJrpYanQ-6UgAj9H1WDO6h5P9-1N3hPyCe0b2XdTrFGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "ulrich=40wisser.se@dmarc.ietf.org" <ulrich=40wisser.se@dmarc.ietf.org>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>, "alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at" <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>, "rep.dot.nop@gmail.com" <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>, "Michael.Bauland@knipp.de" <Michael.Bauland@knipp.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f0c53b05a2b666ed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/chTR2n7ZT9zoJLi8-hS8w8sF4Lc>
Subject: Re: [regext] Implementations of draft-wisser-registrylock?
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 17:06:38 -0000

As an end-user i've always liked the out-of-band registrar-initiated
management of the client status.

I can see a registrar offering both in-band and out-of-band to their
clients.

Also, there appear to be some dangling sentences in section 2.

tim



On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:57 PM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck=
40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> *From:* regext <regext-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Ulrich Wisser
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 7, 2020 11:28 AM
> *To:* regext@ietf.org
> *Cc:* Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>; Bernhard
> Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>; Michael.Bauland@knipp.de
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Implementations of
> draft-wisser-registrylock?
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have made significant changes to the draft.
>
> Many thanks to contributions by Michael Bauland and Bernhard
> Reutner-Fischer.
>
>
>
> Please find the draft at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wisser-registrylock/
>
>
>
> And please give it a review.
>
>
>
> If your registry currently offers or will offer registry lock in the
> future I would be interested to hear how this draft fits or doesn't fit
> your business model.
>
>
>
> I hope you’re doing well, Ulrich! The mechanism described in the draft
> isn’t one that Verisign plans to implement. We do offer a registry lock
> service, but it doesn’t use EPP to avoid situations in which a compromised
> registrar/sponsoring client could unlock a domain and make unauthorized
> changes. We support registrar-initiated management of the client* status
> values for registrar locking.
>
>
>
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email