IETF Logo Mail Archive

[regext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-07.txt

"Andrew Newton (andy)" <andy@hxr.us> Wed, 31 July 2024 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944C8C14F71E for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hxr-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CBW55AvNBj7l for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F27C2C14F70A for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e0b2d2e7dc9so4654328276.2 for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hxr-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1722439209; x=1723044009; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iWXJGu0dwlRn51lQixLUplsa9uDLBk3qzbKplLxXenE=; b=1VEVxeSLGZoUzZ/eZx1Cu74FPMMpm1CMR9040d0o5lE3455KJuNWhpJPuW0a6BXv8M 1lWqhh8nsSiy4YXZCrr5Ke/q0Fvo2ZK9m8zfo59wiuYI17WxBU+Tl8SvxvWwD+Aej4Z6 1+A1KCvK/uIXtNT2fiSGxbD1j2VspiAIdHztCu4D/dKcIIwQ8Kkj2oEw7vX+1awtdqIs 4e7B5AYUZXjPLnVVnvQhSHIwXVsQU6eZvgXsM1xy483fSgAPCbKWtCJwKqYqEqbIorFW KZLVV5s2OWIKHa+FA8almpucbp6JboGmEpvTbRf3aCDdkes9+UDfufjaEBrBYJoncH5s cHmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722439209; x=1723044009; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iWXJGu0dwlRn51lQixLUplsa9uDLBk3qzbKplLxXenE=; b=r1O+Cr9ln8KrQFo/eDCC1AJQ7OrXsIFkLPgZXc37vukEVPP2TBz00kxLhIthHKPdMT N1J9yik5m16Ei08ESN9bDTSiDYrE4a5H5hgAa3wfE05aBffk/kjNJRAmgb2GBMEsJzfH Y2Rhx/7j7o8kV+ZwQ4AAnUnx0pDpKpyha5PfZV4ZtAezL8ZhlI0CAokXaeXq8sFwnMPS ptbFs7dU5oICybB+grcjeo4HjXzRSAmSuHvW5SM5g+obhqCZXVl2EqJwkrkBqqok1ZPa xC+vwGacbHIsQ6EFF7TqoKEDnpAwxxs2NFusQu3MjV9+qyS/zxmwufl5TUL8ozQK2gLB Fgow==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXklX8MgPbZlX0ahWS7pSB1l4b/1u7GB1BkbNQ3r8Kj77WiDXHf5Kddmmbb6B6ZYqrZb15TWg1YucaTkD8cxC4=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwFaRmh+m59an1WuX7eEatde1iXkWgGv668dUZwz2FY2QX2kVwY Lj5ILHMBLmQLgccr8JuKYu7MwGrfZVnq+HD19eSZTXUkPpI0A6tHVsdxILWxP+JfnYUUBJyCjQW G
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE5cVOSQaDE/+sZ0kWLW6IZvI7oPo4n/hn7I5KAriOS+/qoNOdPtGeOwcU2TY/DXcCl1K8sDQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:1207:b0:e0b:3c9d:12a2 with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e0b5449c2b9mr16612146276.25.1722439208650; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.2.8.160] (pool-72-83-25-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [72.83.25.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-7a1d73b1d2fsm754715185a.30.2024.07.31.08.20.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8f747241-2c2a-4df2-b338-42bbdfdadf09@hxr.us>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 11:20:07 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: kowalik@denic.de, regext@ietf.org
References: <172243217153.2152631.577325171851793888@dt-datatracker-659f84ff76-9wqgv> <f041e47b-0429-4439-9f61-d9efb3288f0b@denic.de>
Content-Language: en-US
From: "Andrew Newton (andy)" <andy@hxr.us>
In-Reply-To: <f041e47b-0429-4439-9f61-d9efb3288f0b@denic.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: DTWV7YPWZZ4ORZ7KWJGZNCVFFBGJEM76
X-Message-ID-Hash: DTWV7YPWZZ4ORZ7KWJGZNCVFFBGJEM76
X-MailFrom: andy@hxr.us
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-regext.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [regext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-07.txt
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions Working Group <regext.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/dWHdv9HSD7sek1uAo4TW3T1OomE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:regext-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:regext-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:regext-leave@ietf.org>

On 7/31/24 11:08, kowalik@denic.de wrote:
> I am a bit concerned about this draft. We finished WG LC with version 
> -05, then both -06 and -07 appeared without any discussion on the 
> mailing list.
>
> It would be ok if there would be just nits, but -06 changed normative 
> language and -07 now reshaped the recommendation section effectively 
> putting all practices into the same bucket. I think it was correct in 
> the previous version to make a clear distinction that only the first 
> practice is clear to have "minimal undesired side effects". The other 
> two are proposed practices, which are neither implemented nor tested 
> by anyone, therefore IMHO shall be clearly marked as such.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Pawel
>

Hi Pawel,

These changes are a result of the shepherd review in checking normative 
references and normative language (see my other email, which was likely 
sent when you sent this :) ).

Would you be satisfied if the first recommendation was labeled with 
"This practice has been observed in use." and the other two 
recommendations are labeled with "This practice has not been observed in 
use."?

-andy

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status