Re: [regext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-org-11: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 24 October 2018 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750BE130E47; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.878
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.878 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZHNsM7ZEfwSU; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DF81130E77; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.27] (cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w9OHWZIH038390 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:32:36 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106] claimed to be [10.0.1.27]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FD29F68A-4C43-4D76-A07A-E1FA62F793F3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.0 \(3445.100.39\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <20181024180525369910221@cnnic.cn>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:32:34 -0500
Cc: iesg <iesg@ietf.org>, regext-chairs <regext-chairs@ietf.org>, Pieter Vandepitte <pieter.vandepitte@dnsbelgium.be>, draft-ietf-regext-org <draft-ietf-regext-org@ietf.org>, regext <regext@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <B77EF5B6-00F9-4CC4-9E10-B48595658748@nostrum.com>
References: <154033116074.31409.10404721139795648969.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20181024180525369910221@cnnic.cn>
To: Linlin Zhou <zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/eNN4RTAVaQh-dF2arKDvyqHukcA>
Subject: Re: [regext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-org-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:33:48 -0000

Thanks for your response. It all looks good, except for one item below:

Thanks!

Ben.

> On Oct 24, 2018, at 5:05 AM, Linlin Zhou <zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn> wrote:
> 

[...]

> 
> §9: The org element can contain contact information, possibly including
> personally identifiable information of individuals. Doesn’t this have privacy
> implications that should be discussed here or in a privacy considerations
> section?
> [Linlin] This document is an object extension of EPP that follows all the security requirements for EPP. We do not hope to add any more secure considerations in this document. So this element can be "zero" if you do not like to provide.
> 

I don’t understand how your answer addresses my question. As far as I can tell, this document creates a new object that can contain personally identifiable information (PII). Is that incorrect?

Is there text in EPP that already talks about PII that can be cited?


[...]