[regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-09

Ruth Trevor-Allen <fleeblewidget@gmail.com> Wed, 13 November 2024 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <fleeblewidget@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F80C14F60E for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:12:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.98
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MALFORMED_FREEMAIL=3.062, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SN4Ou2-qyQRa for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:12:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf31.google.com (mail-qv1-xf31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557FDC14F602 for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:12:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf31.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6cbcc2bd800so4365836d6.0 for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:12:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1731485564; x=1732090364; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Zq9oQRPeRMANqKE36lnD/o/YM7KIlQpRxdKL267vxJ8=; b=cRnRinHLB7RF6OlpCoHwLUHfi6xX8MhONCHeXlGZFvq8AuvOEosXbOYdLJ/PEyXvI8 1tudBpmrlSliN51WuiJYPFyRUi8Mip1TSBYl7V9RuDLnKbnH7iitKDLchLSk5cLUaas9 XuPKnvQ8kvMzIMfmwhpVwrcDjnNv/ycGqDySiXRXrK39V9xzKO6Bmi72xlPtJBBk3vL4 NMnwtoEJUksH2DFiWzEb04+V16LKfImeyqDpd13LY3xlxCfh7LytS3ESPGC9U/p2INaC OwIjZCxRY0AImbOj256RBCklvCK+aYPWB1gunzqpuEAYrBJzpmKz0Ik5ewo7lo9ALKfX ObSg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731485564; x=1732090364; h=cc:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Zq9oQRPeRMANqKE36lnD/o/YM7KIlQpRxdKL267vxJ8=; b=YrKnHvdFjrSv6TI6oSJmL3EY/yBMWLX00MAdM13pG5s58ZRaQMLkYOrl8dxL2Cmi0I s36YHZTUSEsUw8Fo/vQi/1IKlrgn04DLRW9gCFgaqNPKtmL1+5M8ypmaznx+nL8KWkU6 VCxZKXK5L8QRIq8d1gHhrfM6ls6FL7wE4PVtBVEmslgVN3xscTQD2CFwHNhiHDaBVZUP G4Td6Wl8dn6JyPzTCsjlRBRm/dJt6+r+HOxd2sepsAfoMX3aMTh+f9kDrFAJuVoKfGYr yN30NXxI6iJF52nKKGzm5Aw7W4pGkB9GmKBeJhiVNl7OEk4J1oEFDJRCEam7zXP1MY+c IPWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy6BjOvN+i9pHBvrWyiWmYKfFUViWszsFtwOKHH/39vDBvwnA+C SMaFoVDOT13sTakxYzSba7Uel6iO2ISEtkMGePjHuL5yySQq4/HNdyUI2xmL4PN+NBPnyD8FBkh 0ol1bAlNZcvZRL+4K0ZN8j37lc3NKWZxO
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGTCOwdfcXvxtXk/TpZTSTVquPV8z5yAoJWhMzU1DBXHW/CMdfgXsmn2mm/Mo7i4vJ/wrx3jbtzf7UrpqeLGD4=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:ef43:0:b0:6cc:1d39:377 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6d39d5899demr299255436d6.13.1731485564389; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:12:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <73182D47-F3BB-4765-8795-180BAEE4A73D@elistx.com>
In-Reply-To: <73182D47-F3BB-4765-8795-180BAEE4A73D@elistx.com>
From: Ruth Trevor-Allen <fleeblewidget@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:12:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAVKzhGEHr9krmQRgJiYBxuoHcD0PZZjSd8A847BGu00x5vvnw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: REGEXT Working Group <regext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ffcfa60626c6e5d5"
Message-ID-Hash: ECGY5VI2S7EOCXH3QW6LXUX5FVQRHDM6
X-Message-ID-Hash: ECGY5VI2S7EOCXH3QW6LXUX5FVQRHDM6
X-MailFrom: fleeblewidget@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-regext.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-09
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions Working Group <regext.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/g-0s0L_ipGuWlngEdjivsxtiEAI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:regext-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:regext-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:regext-leave@ietf.org>

Hi all,

I have no technical objections, I have a couple of very minor editorial
notes. It's possible I've misunderstood though!

Section 6.2.5 - "...the command MUST contain a child <addlEmail:addlEmail>
element (Section 4) for the client to be set or unset an alternate email" -
that 'be' shouldn't be there I think?

End of the same section - "This extension does not add any elements to the
EPP <create> response described in [RFC5730]." possibly this should be
'<update>', not '<create>'?

Thanks,

Ruth

On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 at 08:13, James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com> wrote:

> The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready
> for submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Proposed
> Standard and thus this message begins a working group last call (WGLC):
>
> Use of Internationalized Email Addresses in the Extensible Provisioning
> Protocol (EPP)
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai/22/
>
> This document has been through WGLC previously and was submitted to the
> IESG at that time.  It was reverted back to the working group to resolve
> comments received during the IETF Last Call and IESG review processes.
> These comments have been addressed.  Because the changes made in response
> to the comments are considered to be technically material, the additional
> WGLC is required.
>
> Please indicate your support or no objection for the publication of this
> document by replying to this message on list (a reply of “+1” is
> sufficient).
>
> If any working group member has questions regarding the publication of
> this document please respond on the list with your concerns by close of
> business everywhere, Monday, 25 November 2024.
>
> If there are no objections the document will be submitted to the IESG.
>
> The Document Shepherd for this document is Jody Kolker.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Antoin and Jim
> REGEXT WG Co-Chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to regext-leave@ietf.org
>