IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-02.txt

James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com> Mon, 03 May 2021 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <galvin@elistx.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AE33A1004 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 05:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.886
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.886 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=elistx-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ic7P4teStswa for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 05:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D6143A0FF6 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 May 2021 05:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id j11so299999qtn.12 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 May 2021 05:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elistx-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:embedded-html; bh=nK6yvuEna87mKXb52uWJvPPBXumWol+KL9M+BIHr+7E=; b=gtBA9yaZ7izfUMugSlrw7E0lH5ER7xPf5uWigvKwY+BijgUCWpWL6ZbnT4fIOKbvdw Kts4gKC7S73iNYi+RqPfPZplz5RLF0eXU8HJ8Lqvq88sfpLADVpsujHHholEDWDkMMFf XAxfFw11cvUrmPtlUAdjdQI+damNhsl/qxq7I8KomB/eylRBY4T84seAgXje2R1XPMW8 VKRMlVAM/al7H8TimdC5yC0lX95oul3nzrQ7FkJX3o4rQs9wi7EAjGxAgHA9ozvChRwX kQUKj8ID9Mn0Orewmc/6jgEWTJNLlR+sbVYhgYqbhR+WdI32ji/hQcKnl6F7Wi735kc+ a5/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:embedded-html; bh=nK6yvuEna87mKXb52uWJvPPBXumWol+KL9M+BIHr+7E=; b=VEd6X1idFJ+rTYDxWNZybMnqKfwi/zr9/cVc8rBqwAuuUQFXyn9BKa6eesEPNJLrw4 F0Rxwy8fsQmIzUWB+gQXa7Zm4saak9kkkVyhkxZSsgmHSmZnLaHnDt5uKG4jy09XPOEv gpa1Un3WlBpl4tsGA93DfOS3s/umpFQJjRlcLVftwq6N4suOkMxOUAV+bsUhAIIqvzSs 265X1uXh6826jxPvvzfnHLWXfq/f2UoUfi96MqG2AzW1fwX3iGsCpiP/v5cAat2cWPEv wULmaLCP8QyCztYBAYwjMt0lE6bNjLlsUeapiLZO/698WGUn043vLQveCQ2E7UVJGy0P AQaQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gx2uPOy+RNtWUKuah9SZqirU+kN9RYAF0AIk1oIkpJrkdURGI fEyNJBH9Anh56lpa5DfDUDifM0/JN40MuCcd
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhuqWH2kLi35/2qGP0UOCuSdr1Mx55z8Mn3SIbEEY13d+1vRG4/LKwKTuDiTH6Bafe7rl6Gw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:d83:: with SMTP id s3mr16936999qti.333.1620046759805; Mon, 03 May 2021 05:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.104] (c-73-180-143-136.hsd1.md.comcast.net. [73.180.143.136]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w6sm8354222qkw.109.2021.05.03.05.59.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 May 2021 05:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>
To: Jothan Frakes <jothan@jothan.com>
Cc: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org>, Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 08:59:30 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673)
Message-ID: <2FBFE415-ABA2-4A20-B733-0D3D643FB6F3@elistx.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGrS0FL8Kzf+qeUpcgrGMmxFk5o=iV4PO-iw2R3o=+SCykM9sQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <161618674042.22507.10808743378505549415@ietfa.amsl.com> <2B014069-2EBA-426C-B018-84F63CEC4AE0@viagenie.ca> <A8DFE3D7-0345-401E-B105-CB0B3B3C84C1@arin.net> <2A273A21-123D-45C3-8340-5A69B4182C73@antoin.nl> <05891D46-4A1E-4196-A173-E58C4A332F8E@viagenie.ca> <CAGrS0FL8Kzf+qeUpcgrGMmxFk5o=iV4PO-iw2R3o=+SCykM9sQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_319FC641-7EA5-4FEA-BFF7-2D0EB6610CCB_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Embedded-HTML: [{"HTML":[683, 3435], "plain":[278, 1441], "uuid":"B6306289-125F-4817-8B29-866591AC164C"}]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/i9nXfkLyxNnqUSFG2RbyaMVFA68>
Subject: Re: [regext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 12:59:26 -0000

Jothan,

Your message is confusing.

The subject of the message suggests you’re supporting rfc7484bis, but 
the content of the message is all about registry-maintenance.

Would you please clarify your support?

Thanks,

Jim



On 15 Apr 2021, at 12:50, Jothan Frakes wrote:

> +1    draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance looks good to me
>
> Just to be clear, since this is a 2nd WGLC, the new WGLC is for
>> draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-12
>
>
>
>>> Op 29 mrt. 2021, om 14:49 heeft Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>
>> <&lt;ietf@antoin.nl&gt;> het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>> The following working group document is believed to be ready for
>> submission to the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
>>>
>>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance/
>>>
>>> EXTRA ATTENTION: This is the second WGLC for this document. During 
>>> the
>> first WGLC, there were still some substantial comments to be 
>> addressed, and
>> there was not enough positive feedback to declare consensus on this
>> document. Let’s do better this time and please take the time to 
>> review this
>> document and indicate your support (a simple “+1” is sufficient) 
>> or
>> concerns with the publication of this document by replying to this 
>> message
>> on the list. Since we have 3 authors, we need more reviewers to state
>> support!
>>>
>>> This WG last call will end at close of business, Monday, 12 April 
>>> 2021.
>>>
>>>
>>> The document shepherd for this document is James Galvin.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Antoin and Jim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> regext mailing list
>>> regext@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext


> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email