[regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 06 October 2021 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: regext@ietf.org
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988883A1E3F; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 08:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance@ietf.org, regext-chairs@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org, James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>, galvin@elistx.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.38.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <163353518058.23956.18318419779214778556@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 08:46:20 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/k12cvogUtPSNN4TYkRXukRarT1U>
Subject: [regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 15:46:21 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document.

Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be
appreciated even if only for my own education).

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

-- Section 3.3 --

In "mantid", should the reference for the encoding of the language be mentioned
?

The use of "maint:tlds" seems to indicate a limitation to top-level domains
only (even if the text mentions later "registry zone") but EPP is used not only
for TLD. Suggest to make it even clearer (as I am afraid that it is too late in
the process to change the element name).

-- Section 4.1.3.1 --
In the example, there is "<maint:type lang="en">" but lang is not specified as
an attribute of "maint:type" in section 3.3.