Re: [regext] Virtual Interim Meeting Question: XXXX and YYYY in rfc7482bis

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: regext <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Alexander Mayrhofer
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 2:35 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck=[e-mail]>rg>;
> [e-mail]
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Virtual Interim Meeting Question: XXXX
> and YYYY in rfc7482bis
>
> Hello Scott,
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: regext <[e-mail]> Im Auftrag von Hollenbeck, Scott
> > Betreff: [regext] Virtual Interim Meeting Question: XXXX and YYYY in
> > rfc7482bis
>
> [AM] My point was that the text on the slide...
>
> > "Syntax: domains?nsLdhName =<domain search pattern>
> > Syntax: domains?nsIp =<domain search pattern> XXXX is a search pattern
> > representing a domain name in "letters, digits, hyphen" (LDH) format
> > [RFC5890] in a zone administered by the server operator of a DNR YYYY
> > is a search pattern representing a host name in "letters, digits,
> > hyphen" format [RFC5890] in a zone administered by the server operator
> of a DNR"
>
> [AM] .. contained one query based on and LDH name, and one query based
> on an IP address, but both search patterns referred to LDH names. I had the
> impression that one of the search patterns would need to be an IP address
> (for the second query parameter). But I do admit that was an uneducated
> comment that I made without reading the document itself.

It turns out that the text on the slide was incorrect. The document itself says this:

   Syntax: domains?name=<domain search pattern>

   Syntax: domains?nsLdhName=<nameserver search pattern>

   Syntax: domains?nsIp=<IP address search pattern>

So the document itself is correct. Sorry for the confusion!

Scott