Re: [regext] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-08

"Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com> Sat, 25 July 2020 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27973A0C43; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 09:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=HPh/5djS; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=04L1PNEH
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zpwdAnnhWpOB; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 09:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AF653A0C44; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 09:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7575; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1595694671; x=1596904271; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=zE9wu+cbsLqTcCRCo4tfkB78xxx1Vd3R7xH6YTWOdk4=; b=HPh/5djSXP4tbbInQcgj9yMvhPWfd2PGlNCMNM/b4GwUB9U9PHZT/YBZ fNKir4UPet2l1CfR4t5xUm6liZNv2/77xS71JC8Uu3oJVTxEtTHrC7X1u nxX+gUYeYW92mhATmBqMgRMnRYz4nhUqdeB3macAooFWzKYhcK3YrmIRj U=;
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BsDAD+XBxf/5tdJa1gHgEBCxIMQIMcUQeBRy8sCodwA?= =?us-ascii?q?40wlBqEbIJTA1ULAQEBDAEBLQIEAQGETAKCIgIkOBMCAwEBAQMCAwEBAQEFA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAgEGBG2FXAyFcgIEEi4BATcBDwIBCD8HMhQRAgQOBSKDBIF/TQMuAaJ8A?= =?us-ascii?q?oE5iGF0gTSDAQEBBYU0GIIOCYE4gm2KEBqBQT+BEScMEIJNPoU1glGCLY9Fi?= =?us-ascii?q?XQmnA8Kgl6UfYRxAx6fZJEtnC2DVgIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaiOBV3AVZQGCPj4SF?= =?us-ascii?q?wINjh4MF4NOilZ0NwIGCAEBAwl8jiEBgRABAQ?=
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AXMES9BEtapFOBAYeXnH5Lp1GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7I?= =?us-ascii?q?YmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e401gebVoLe8+9YhvCQtLrvCiQM4peE5XYFdpEEFx?= =?us-ascii?q?oIkt4fkAFoBsmZQVb6I/jnY21ffoxCWVZp8mv9PR1TH8DzNFbVp2Wv8TMIXB?= =?us-ascii?q?LlOlk9KuH8AIWHicOx2qi78IHSZAMdgj27bPtyIRy6oB+XuNMRhN5pK706zV?= =?us-ascii?q?3CpX4bdg=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,395,1589241600"; d="scan'208,217";a="509705692"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 25 Jul 2020 16:31:10 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06PGVAiL005326 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 25 Jul 2020 16:31:10 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 11:31:09 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 12:31:08 -0400
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 11:31:08 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=RRaDy1yrTNegp98klWbyg5a0yF8AKMKNfvBFT53M7hmh/W5+0bU7hYrAaE6CdliedGDFg+37APnBseydFkUYjp2+ICKkr8vPrjcKTtXZhmiNlQxEIF75HEBmMrb+IiaDlteypSrqmiZ5kijEsWUCkfJ/EbLlKhAADCpehD2iOlr2DfrvVc6h9JF0aXnw/CN9ERzNz1Flqgida+nXUDqefFkEalUtDEThfcrJedQpZWJwgCuiFmRxdwyknrwvxk2QwzcltWRQQ1vD/Yz0XZIRVKg4yWEBmBYH9LTVOCIhumVfm+NzQySV7D500YxgSjLdj48UqQHTMpUlWNyMT+V3iw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=WTS3WFmThibfN38xdhVDJD1Ya1m0sUMstC2qjrJYUdQ=; b=VPmqT7fpNdWtOokQaN5iiHHgPduBRKsrRJ+Z7hNgZol2NDlFofyCc2P211ujPQaDrYeKjKdHXBKVerp03ZGE9ZCMW/SxsSxQh289V9I4VY2ol9HofCesHk1JbFhdZSehffWjkU7XJz3KqMAs4OhaRJVU5cTDWbBkPdkGI6v/9wcGBW2Ywkf1cNU0htKyj7fAh9jr9/6F7D3zHTrP7a8f49k2hgHCyfuYxEhWrhbT1ihvvQUJ4b+WNTj7nWEVzqdrzW2VnwTXRHwst4qhuxMeTiYG0b/cGwsa45FS1y/Cy1Q8kT2APXUcnkADXtSHJu4zi7bAWjPGFMOGyB7LXE2dSQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=WTS3WFmThibfN38xdhVDJD1Ya1m0sUMstC2qjrJYUdQ=; b=04L1PNEHM5M7IaTqaNNfBKnhUc1jWC2rJJP3OT0o95KNYXJKLq2hiVCh6dGayOhs5SVBUzdU0uxcCgE8aaGM9wKuHjKfm4Zo0attp/jeYVcjVATmQFy0wLqYQUAiUc1iZ48Ag+p4LwGyvXapDXuKD0htYFDI85a3Hq2hy1l8k2s=
Received: from BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:e::12) by BN7PR11MB2819.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:406:b4::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3216.24; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 16:31:07 +0000
Received: from BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2949:27ee:578f:1a83]) by BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2949:27ee:578f:1a83%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3216.028; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 16:31:07 +0000
From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-08
Thread-Index: AQHWYqDi64I8eHIPxkKS6fejmCKVsakYfLsA
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 16:31:07 +0000
Message-ID: <A5E5491F-709C-4136-BF74-5E4A9C8C0166@cisco.com>
References: <159569207226.17171.11673402373410373537@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJL1YcDr48mvK3GuhnW_dd7Buat07BFM=zD0TG7CxHzpGQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJL1YcDr48mvK3GuhnW_dd7Buat07BFM=zD0TG7CxHzpGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
authentication-results: computer.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;computer.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.78]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b1fb7932-f086-4eed-02a5-08d830b821eb
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN7PR11MB2819:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN7PR11MB28190C41428666A5ED145774B8740@BN7PR11MB2819.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7691;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: UtKh7Sn7y8zX4eNfQx9pUYcXZHvGzR2RpcoDBVU9XYAxeepVDvjPtQy8Qfd5+/nAWNVSbEQ9J80A3nqAraRdDkW/9gUXVcqxk9kpyBtB0OTH/VxYaKo5KYlK8SsMbuULkEuJeXfCvtydBU5rlQ4ciT3JoCjTXlctIAW5FaN32s0pBJ1BZ+8idUYHNX7FAXh5dDAfZ72/nsVb4n56XE0loYZ7/Naq1MWkE1nI2skAu2s7Z3QHLBJzJjh3Cx/4J+P8mTQilmtH3pPqRiTVg52GYpIWzv35SDeGZkIWCMDLiDt+DyMTf+4YXE9SFSD/N05SYCjqL32qAolIOK7kBGHe8Q==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(396003)(136003)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(6506007)(66476007)(66946007)(83380400001)(54906003)(478600001)(5660300002)(53546011)(66556008)(6512007)(91956017)(76116006)(316002)(64756008)(66446008)(36756003)(2906002)(2616005)(26005)(6486002)(71200400001)(33656002)(186003)(8676002)(4326008)(8936002)(86362001)(6916009); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A5E5491F709C4136BF745E4A9C8C0166ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b1fb7932-f086-4eed-02a5-08d830b821eb
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Jul 2020 16:31:07.2441 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: oaXsz6J52DxnEEW2nFOijcv4InAeWNmpFge58hwIKhd+eRwWFVCvd/0MyQRo7FioZIvMPcHBtOTqcOzM0a+SAA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN7PR11MB2819
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/l7U1MLRufDRvlGY7DqQHKT3_wh0>
Subject: Re: [regext] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-08
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 16:31:16 -0000

Thanks, Barry.

Joe

On Jul 25, 2020, at 12:29, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org<mailto:barryleiba@computer.org>> wrote:

Thanks for the reminder and the review, Joe.  I will make sure your comments are addressed before the document moves forward.

Barry

On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 11:47 AM Joe Clarke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org<mailto:noreply@ietf.org>> wrote:
Reviewer: Joe Clarke
Review result: Has Issues

I didn't see any of my comments addressed in the text nor do I recall seeing a
reply to my previous review.  I;m copying my previous review here.

I have been assigned to review this document on behalf of the Ops Area
Directorate.  This document augments the work set forth in
I-D.ietf-regext-data-escrow to specify the objects that can be used in Domain
Name Registration Data escrow deposits.  What I found most useful in this
document is the incremental examples of the objects with the full XML and CSV
deposit (and diff deposit) examples at the bottom.  In general, the fields in
the object models were well specified and coupled with the examples, it helped
to piece together the product one might need to produce.

That said, I went back and forth between "Has Nits" and "Has Issues".  One
thing that would really help this document is a full terminology/glossary
section that includes expansions of abbreviations like RDE, EPP, NNDN, etc.
Some abbreviations like TLD, CSV, and IDN are expanded, but this is very much
required for all and throughout with very common ones done so in the
terminology section.

Next, in Section 4.4, you talk about CSV file checksums.  First, you reference
ISO-3309 (HDLC?) but there is no actual reference like there is with
ISO-3166-1.  But why use crc32 for a file checksum?  Why reference HDLC as the
model?  I would think a SHA-2 checksum would be better for an actual file to
ensure it has not been tampered with.

When you talk about file compression for CSV (Section 4.6.2.1), you mention
compression may use zip or gzip.  There is no normative language here, and I
can imagine escrow holders would need to know the allowed values.  If I use xz
will that be allowed?  Will the consumer know how to decompress that?  What is
"zip" and "gzip" exactly and how should they be handled?  My advice is some
normative text here explaining the supported or allowed formats and by what
standard those are defined.

Finally, as a nit, I noticed two instances of IPv6 address
1080:0:0:0:8:800:200C:417A when showing XML model examples.  In the CSV
examples you use an address from the doc range.  Did you mean to do so here as
well?