Re: [regext] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-10

"Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com> Wed, 27 July 2022 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <jgould@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3DFC15AD22; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 06:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.409
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n8_GRVS-f86b; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 06:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.verisign.com (mail1.verisign.com [72.13.63.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CE2FC15AD43; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 06:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=3724; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1658930043; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=6M0zMe9G37CnfHnVwElQmfF0lGz/PND5lpky5NZCAVc=; b=WIQQbOmFzv3dqhoIcNJgl/GUmXc6vaX+8cf+IuI5IKFpewnay2HjsNC5 qyD8uOPZtHyjma7+DvQGQx7XohJc2QobRBotCwwPbUSn44gyzbN6kgMmI XPP4XEidCZynF9u7HpmQBZot4qaYnd+bXWSRRQo78M/9HbwM1Nv9LAgSY vh4clX6SwF41wIuZQVmZu73zk8iq7yIFbQgNEBl5aBawFzyfyc1lZs1YV U7kLHtXkH8t1wHaWc0yruLQ/S9x4dfw+rgXE387V6mm5m1VhAhdbeAvb5 VlBYvshXERG4QaHirQUVoW6lAbttZwU9Nv+lQQIg5dvB5wd3Kha5emfnf Q==;
IronPort-Data: A9a23:j4KTzK6X065x2x3PUZd30AxRtPXGchMFZxGqfqrLsTDasY5as4F+v mcdWW6FPfeMazP2LdxwYYXn9hkGsJDXy4NlSlBkrC02Eysa+MHIO4+Ufxz6V8+wwm8vb2o8t plDNYOQRCwQZiWBzvt4GuG59RGQ7UwML1bFILas1hpZHGeIcw98z0M48wIFqtQw24LhXFnS4 YqaT/D3YzdJ5RYlagr41Ire8HuDjNyq0N/PlgVjDRzjlAa2e0g9VPrzF4noR5fLatA88tqBe gr25OrRElXxpE5xV4z/wt4XRWVRKlLaFVDmZnN+BfD+0kAazsA4+v5T2PE0MS+7h9gV9jzYJ RokWZGYEG8U0qPwdOs1WhZEEg0jGfV84vz7ESmvle+ryHb2bC65qxluJBle0Yww0NxRWF5o2 MxAcnYTZReZn6S/zPSlUPJqwM8kKaEHPqtG4jc5kmqfVKt9B8ySK0nJzYYwMDMYhM9JAPLST 9QUczt0bRvGJRZIPz/7Dbpnw7v53CaiIlW0rnqs9Ygb2DLqzDV/yYi2C8HfI/mrGfhKyxPwS mXuuj6R7gshHN6YyTzA83+wiMfNliC9U4UXfJW6+fl3hFHGmjQNBQcXTlq0p7+yjUuWV9dWM UdS+ycyo+417kPDZsPwRBu5q32sswYdQMZdFuB87gyRooLb7gDcD3IYZj9MdNJgs9U5LRQmz FaHg5boCCBh9aeYRn+N6vKZtSv3NCEUa2YGYQcFQBcLpd75r+kbihvUUpNoGaqxptz4BT+2x CqFxAAkiroendIj1qin8xbAmT3Em3TSZgQv4FzIWG+1tlk8f5C/IYmp8h3R6rBKNoDACEebp 35CkM+bhAwTMayweOW2aL1lNNmUCzytaVUwXXYH80EdygmQ
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:KKYja6G/VuiXX+3ipLqENceALOsnbusQ8zAXPidKOHlom62j5q KTdZsgtSMc5Ax+ZJhCo7+90cC7KBvhHPVOkOos1NmZPTXOiS+HIIZv9oP+zzClMD2WzIJg/J YlV6RlEtX/ARxZgdaS2mOFOudl5NWc6qiniaPl0nF3QWhRBp1I9QtjFQqBKEFwSTRHAZZRLv Gh2vY=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,195,1654560000"; d="scan'208";a="17492759"
Received: from BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.48) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2375.28; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:53:59 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.173.153.48]) by BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.173.153.48]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.028; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:53:59 -0400
From: "Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com>
To: "john-ietf@jck.com" <john-ietf@jck.com>, "jgould=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org" <jgould=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "resnick@episteme.net" <resnick@episteme.net>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-10
Thread-Index: AQHYocBSrGeZEI8vTEWa9yuyrqmffg==
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:53:59 +0000
Message-ID: <77D1E728-B972-4909-B367-151BF32A36D8@verisign.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.62.22061100
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B2B72CDBFD391042ABEDB3E800105246@verisign.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/ljIoGJtWaiLv8gw4SsSQVOs0xsM>
Subject: Re: [regext] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-10
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:54:07 -0000

John, 

It was my conclusion that no change was needed based on a review of the thread.  Dmitry, the document shepherd (Jody Kolker), and I re-reviewed the thread that originated with Pete's issue.  Pete's issue was associated with a better explanation for the extra ASCII email address.  The draft should not be concerned about where the email address comes from or what format the registrar (client) is collecting it, which is policy and not technical.  From a technical perspective, the email needs to be an ASCII email address should be fine.  The policy statements from the draft can be removed to address your and Pete's issue:

1.	Delete "It can be an extra ASCII email address collected by registrar or registrar-provided proxy email address." from the fifth bullet in section 5.3.2.
2.	Delete “The provided address can be an extra ASCII email address collected by registrar or registrar-provided proxy email address." from the last bullet in section 5.3.2.  

Do you agree with these changes to the draft?  

Do you have any additional feedback that needs to be addressed?

Thanks,

-- 
 
JG



James Gould
Fellow Engineer
jgould@Verisign.com <applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgould@Verisign.com>

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/>

On 7/26/22, 3:37 PM, "John C Klensin" <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:


    --On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 18:37 +0000 "Gould, James"
    <jgould=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

    > Pete,
    > 
    > We addressed some of your feedback (Minor issues and
    > Nits/editorial comments) in draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-13 and I
    > responded to your Major issues below.  Do the updates made in
    > draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-13 and the explanation for your
    > Major issues address your feedback or is more needed?  There
    > was a follow-on thread with John C Klensin, Martin J. Dürst,
    > and Dmitry Belyavsky that didn't look to result in any needed
    > changes to the draft. 

    James,

    Just for the record... I don't know how Martin feels about this,
    but my conclusion from that thread was precisely that you and/or
    Dmitry concluded that no change was needed.  I did not agree
    with that conclusion, merely concluded that further discussion
    would be a waste of time.  FWIW, that conclusion about the
    issues raised was reached without consultation with the WG and
    so cannot be assumed to represent WG consensus.

    So, from my perspective, those issues (including the one that
    Pete raised) continue to be unresolved and I hope the IESG will
    treat them accordingly.

        john