IETF Logo Mail Archive

[regext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-07.txt

kowalik@denic.de Wed, 31 July 2024 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <kowalik@denic.de>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33DAC151552 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.806
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.806 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=denic.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48P41oVubhAv for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout-b-110.mailbox.org (mout-b-110.mailbox.org [195.10.208.55]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C52FC14F6BE for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [10.196.197.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-b-110.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WZ3yj6NGGz9wvZ; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 22:45:49 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denic.de; s=MBO0001; t=1722458749; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QXSeXU7dOOzfzwOc7BQ8FmX3uEPTcqqxYXZU6mFW2b0=; b=h4mbSuSrxuYUIjbN8lMLrr89UDc48mbjKJNj7dqmJErzZPlIBtkKt6xwJBx4zNwDPRwYAF wvgk0vUVkkkPla1Jt7RcQn2n+Cj4XFXhvzaQ+/0abMBjL3LMD3fY5uvMyd6qbGpSbBMQa4 1u+JP7q0iOLXfSJFVbRAggsxkUyCxTuSG8tGH6IITBeMG1d/uEHY116JNhddvBDkPQQ/Oi OIlL1SKe9FfJGOBTTDpAIfaxrNL0aLL8kyPdkSNIadrhYLSWP52WyCMG5LXJ/rW05Ji4lg Mkw2GUWfpMNgeLUdYwfNpQyLJFlaeK3pgnsLcHsW8D9wZCaRmpwdtN+p4Rg9MA==
Message-ID: <ce6842d5-154c-4b61-81c4-ac245c80059c@denic.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 22:45:48 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: kowalik@denic.de
To: "Andrew Newton (andy)" <andy@hxr.us>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
References: <172243217153.2152631.577325171851793888@dt-datatracker-659f84ff76-9wqgv> <f041e47b-0429-4439-9f61-d9efb3288f0b@denic.de> <8f747241-2c2a-4df2-b338-42bbdfdadf09@hxr.us> <9e2810a9-9f40-4c8b-8981-291b2094581d@denic.de> <7ab277ac-8dc2-49a0-b5fe-ac469296cb47@hxr.us> <56d2fd23-4a4a-4fc2-b18b-7bffaff49801@denic.de> <93a84f6b-eb4e-4ea4-a15e-b8b1fe727bd4@hxr.us>
Content-Language: en-GB, de-DE
In-Reply-To: <93a84f6b-eb4e-4ea4-a15e-b8b1fe727bd4@hxr.us>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-512"; boundary="------------ms020602060907050705050404"
X-MBO-RS-ID: 43f93252dfbd7d262ba
X-MBO-RS-META: gcqb9648kga6wekib1x6sjdaurycxr86
Message-ID-Hash: PYCJUYDKQ7ICSCR4WNHD3QTJJ5NGLE45
X-Message-ID-Hash: PYCJUYDKQ7ICSCR4WNHD3QTJJ5NGLE45
X-MailFrom: kowalik@denic.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-regext.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [regext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-07.txt
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions Working Group <regext.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/maC4FQ3EayEDkH8V20VtiXmtN6M>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:regext-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:regext-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:regext-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Andy,

On 31.07.24 22:16, Andrew Newton (andy) wrote:
> Pawel,
>
> The issues you have raised about changes necessary for either or both 
> the EPP client and EPP server appear to me to go beyond normative 
> language. Given this type of language  is not in any version of the 
> draft, does this mean you are not supportive of this document 
> regardless of the -05 or -07 version?
>
> -andy 

-05 and -06 were fine and I'm supportive of those. If it's SHOULD or 
MUST or we remove normative language entirely would not be substantial 
change IMHO.

-07 restructured the section 6 so that the 2 issues appeared:

     1) removed preamble and paragraphs so that current and proposed 
practices were set as equal choice to implementers

     2) added normative text which means the changes are only to be 
implemented by servers

Kind Regards,

Pawel

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status