Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis

Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org> Tue, 05 January 2021 00:59 UTC

Return-Path: <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133FE3A0C2F for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:59:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cgKvn93wOezv for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:59:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppa5.dc.icann.org (ppa5.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 808173A0C28 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:59:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) by ppa5.dc.icann.org (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with ESMTPS id 1050xPns014333 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 00:59:25 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.130) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.721.2; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:59:24 -0800
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.130]) by MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.130]) with mapi id 15.02.0721.006; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:59:24 -0800
From: Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
To: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis
Thread-Index: AQHW4kbb49nlGUquJ0qXgsi4XYhPxqoYN3WA
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:59:23 +0000
Message-ID: <C1AEF801-2328-4C5F-A386-20C4ED61D4EB@icann.org>
References: <0A99F364-01DF-4A81-99F6-04D1396ACC4F@antoin.nl> <X/KGi6es9i3CIPrW@tomh-laptop>
In-Reply-To: <X/KGi6es9i3CIPrW@tomh-laptop>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.42.20101102
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9323D7BD9E330E41938320C834A594B4@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-01-04_16:2021-01-04, 2021-01-04 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/moaNPS3_wMX9As1jgbKQVl6IqAc>
Subject: Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:59:28 -0000

+1

Regards,
Gustavo

On 1/3/21, 19:08, "regext on behalf of Tom Harrison" <regext-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of tomh@apnic.net> wrote:

    On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:55:21PM +0100, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
    > This is a special second working group last call for:
    > 
    > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis/__;!!PtGJab4!p2_BfZH9Y8vnN676ppNgsIRm-UPlaLAydCT_TUXRsN7u2EwiQK5_Yzct8TxaGfN9IgUwZOEV3Ww$ 
    > 
    > This document is suggested to be elevated from “proposed standard”
    > to "Internet standard” as described by the process in RFC6410.
    > We therefor seek specific consensus from reviewers that they are
    > aware of the elevation requirements, and that they have reviewed
    > this document with the elevation intention in mind.
    > 
    > Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple “+1”
    > is sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this document as
    > “Internet standard” by replying to this message on the list.
    > 
    > This WG last call will end Sunday, 2 January 2021.

    +1

    -Tom

    _______________________________________________
    regext mailing list
    regext@ietf.org
    https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext__;!!PtGJab4!p2_BfZH9Y8vnN676ppNgsIRm-UPlaLAydCT_TUXRsN7u2EwiQK5_Yzct8TxaGfN9IgUwYjqqdJE$