Re: [regext] regarding draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging and draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response

James Galvin <> Fri, 26 June 2020 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C31D3A0C4A for <>; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 06:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ug9BpsH5yrqp for <>; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 06:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0003B3A0BC8 for <>; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 06:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id z63so8661464qkb.8 for <>; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 06:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WPUjPYd8q/8UhQD/1IaGxXWdtLRh0r1rV5ALtSSs12I=; b=x3lkucxrrhLpJkC/8ctPvEVfn76xFUeSa0JHguH6VGLmM+UYohGgHHx7ABPadYOyR9 gsOKwtWufDKWtRXlaQq6JkNQ9DsfbvhxFPNNCKJZN4aXYiBTk7mEe6XvZJwa0OPFh1ZB 2yn6hGBwGrsGH3o+mRTte6px0AKilN+XLm0kBs7IMRJzr5V9PrkV6VGFdvfPTdHdnS6k Rw1M9vSxmFVtneva8H9zqQIT+IGRthOOSvENaknzdFK5AKS1jw3QlyOigmSDhuKgXWqz EkbD6pUnJXKDUmytS0E4GI1TwJ+Ecjt0QLuITjlwCT4PiLu6+VMq+9BRjcOmJzlXZTlp LW3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WPUjPYd8q/8UhQD/1IaGxXWdtLRh0r1rV5ALtSSs12I=; b=GMCWCf6uVM2DyicHjOy+KawLq40ES8fzDcB/cje3OzWGI+QlHDWOXW/nCzLMSAqRZn hGai5S7OkzEvlQEpfMJoVljVxM46BRZXX79Mnh45Imlg8jC2Cu+/AefkSG/VISmycoDG Pf/2lKSYefK60LofwHm4TnQlrT/AcDS9Rv071YpBMVgQXs6ba4mHxdD6DxGHW9dlfy0A QjXr7C6+bS2QMLO5TEol0hydY/945NCv4J1dNk0GYCsq5uQCuA2/QJiQ+WAhKAR1WS1w S332vp0U9nybtVl+yKf72xRQ09oznDU63oteFMrfNLWgkjPavUtndUoXh37+ikI4vbKO m6/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qICNi/GscMPJRG6v4SbaMv4zaG41zhxyW+QiAxTo277EPTxlq yPpja/wh3Ek4ZQLowweCZaXSzVdURhc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyCFHd0v76cmB44xWRHXm9pTeMc96kai42PxVdorwvBArfyV5aYXhK1SfObw8DIBGvrh8qow==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:9c7:: with SMTP id y7mr1696290qky.55.1593177533686; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 06:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ([2601:154:c202:9d20:7cde:f8d0:bd60:ad6c]) by with ESMTPSA id b186sm5522926qkd.28.2020. for <> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 06:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: "James Galvin" <>
To: "Registration Protocols Extensions WG" <>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:19:37 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [regext] regarding draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging and draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:18:57 -0000

The Chairs have reviewed these last set of changes and believe them all 
to be editorial.

As there have been no objections to resubmitting these documents the 
Chairs will do so shortly.

Thanks to all,

Antoin and Jim

On 19 Jun 2020, at 9:47, James Galvin wrote:

> I’m sure you recall that the documents:
> Had been previously submitted to the IESG for consideration as 
> Proposed Standards on 25 May 2020.  What you may not have noticed is 
> that our Area Director reviewed the documents prior to distributing 
> them to the entire IESG (this is an ordinary step in the process) and 
> requested some editorial changes to the documents prior to their 
> consideration for publication.
> The authors have revised the documents as requested and now the Chairs 
> need to ask the working group to confirm that the proposed changes are 
> only editorial and not material.
> You can go to the history tab for each document on the data tracker 
> and compare the most recent version to any prior version.  The 
> following two links will compare the most recent versions to their 
> immediately preceding versions directly:
> Would you please review these documents prior to COB Thursday, 25 June 
> 2020?  If you have any concerns with or objections to the changes 
> please respond to the list.  If there are no objections the Chairs 
> will resubmit the documents to the IESG on Friday, 26 June 2020.
> Thanks in advance for your prompt attention,
> Antoin and Jim