IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] AD review of draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-05

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 18 February 2020 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D227912080D; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:39:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Emhb0r-ENWkt; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:39:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-f178.google.com (mail-il1-f178.google.com [209.85.166.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B5B812080C; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:39:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-f178.google.com with SMTP id s18so17486030iln.0; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:39:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h2rzDcqW3LWaXiz/1Reh/EbBkCMVAWHSh1B9nLXP4Ho=; b=tlYEUhz+EMi5girNiJSxyCiw0XiCcNlrgdmZG2063b4KWlHDP2ifoXAU/OuVjmvTr1 QKFr+xe75a4XfA0Z1RK4uOAk+2fWnAV8RttNRWc+T+YHJxRp4cKV917+SrXfvIDqEmoo wIz112zXeIZPI4sZAALrFMYsBHd/LT9QWoZZFTfh29dASqgRnIuVN1/G/B7NJEvTvkR4 210zLBEgGtb4On7XuEyY1Kz/mOOdcM7ppy6xhohNS1+jGmXeCcaZHlhIQBO73wZMcinM uLXga9kQOx+Sf5QJC+1SyfVnc+imzisqZKQDjuFj2LcDYLpDffr8hlk4ytP069rCQxhG LWXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXxs9ZxstO6GK6fa1ui2Pfshby5/U4q059LrdU/dd56gz5Yd6dL b/p4tpv0WUGIilBw/6WtnsfJX8mbF9FGxC6Rb0o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzcHvIV2Hqi/O84MFuIcvH/UviWU0cHIZp+eds2QBSbT5WHIIXSA2/u7mFfp+iF5O1VEqx+x1O68bFVunuSsLw=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:9885:: with SMTP id a5mr19886342ill.107.1582036756289; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:39:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJJKGLxCanozQiJYeAj-Ek3E8bgABo2qVmDcMTm6-DMbNQ@mail.gmail.com> <3c5a8f1d1468497ba63cc99013820e88@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <3c5a8f1d1468497ba63cc99013820e88@verisign.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:39:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CALaySJKN=yXh_yvyKRjoACYD_GfGLXg63M6zNUaoG+OVG0h1Qg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping.all@ietf.org>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e15df9059edaa28f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/q6VmGPW-h_DexGyT6LguS3cs6tE>
Subject: Re: [regext] AD review of draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-05
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:39:19 -0000

Ok, thanks, Scott.  I did read the writeup, but interpreted it to mean that
we still needed a full schema review.  Sorry for the misinterpretation.

Barry

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 5:34 AM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
> > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 11:44 PM
> > To: draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping.all@ietf.org
> > Cc: regext <regext@ietf.org>
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] AD review of draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-
> > 05
> >
> > Again, I’m sorry I didn’t get to this sooner.  Here’s my review.  I have
> some
> > items that I want to resolve (some of which might need some
> > discussion) before this goes to last call, and I’m putting those first.
>
> [snip]
>
> > — Section 9 —
> > A note that I did not review the schemas, as I am not a schema expert.
> > I am concerned that I have not seen evidence yet that a schema expert has
> > given this a good look.
>
> Barry, I noted the schema review situation in the shepherd write-up. I
> checked it, and I worked with the author to run it and the examples through
> a series of automated checks using the xerces XML parser. It's
> syntactically correct and valid as far as I can determine.
>
> Scott
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email