Re: [regext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-16

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 03 July 2019 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD0812006E; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 06:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vc8ISGuMSU4M; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 06:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f52.google.com (mail-io1-f52.google.com [209.85.166.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D3341200B4; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 06:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f52.google.com with SMTP id j6so4676336ioa.5; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 06:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fbnxI6ac5yWntHrypuewJLsZ9CgefYBeFX59oAWkHYw=; b=nVs6n08gZahvx2aFYiSvbcv3h7asjkfAvIwk+qitw/BbTo1lvlmhvtBHThep4zxibW 3PdnlpwcMTnqDdA4fdkN5nUYexW/MKYQWTPdGuBGwOqM1/IOcly4Slr9LWKM5qu6R1b1 P3Ysm0+3N8afZattembKyAn7sby5VLn6ym2LH34/VAhTlScTfuPLOVu4s3nmvnGoYiCc 9ETgKKNSTJMWtnXpwzqZeSQPoWcHU+eHZHHTSxJgH8KA75is61TAvEkTHZw3aNlh9b3t buGPgmC/WX9uUCCnluc7h2+KslhxJysSqoPF90NC+dLy35CbTT/uzeEaVL+UiWnp0jZG +RcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX9yv/taWlunjTVKOkDWxZdkbh+nPSK50Su/at5JSWkLXfiSsBb 8SLJqfx0S0fK7Qr1M7/kECg5U8q2CyeaqcstwiQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxEdR0BGv2GgSBl9py8CwkPeEkhsX91LY36eHqdE5jH7iKNlJEZXLz+FWvLmlFTPe4ALRjoVqAHx1Um7J5me9c=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:9701:: with SMTP id w1mr1875494ioj.294.1562159873034; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 06:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156214026874.14820.1075097887450900352@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156214026874.14820.1075097887450900352@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 09:17:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJKsesPDkS2vAMUvcDReRraU+h6R-R3N3MKVVB5CE=jmiQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@cisco.com>
Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees.all@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/szCaz4NiyNLMi3ZVzsiZDQ4G6KU>
Subject: Re: [regext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-16
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 13:22:59 -0000

Thanks, Carlos, for the review.

On one item in your list:

> 4. S3.4. Does this text imply there is no zero fee or credit possible? Might be
> useful to explicitly set guidance for the use of 0/null fee/credit.
>
>    A <fee:fee> element MUST
>    have a non-negative value.  A <fee:credit> element MUST have a
>    negative value.

The text says the fee can be zero ("non-negative"), but the credit
can't (has to be negative).  That makes general sense, doesn't it?  Do
you really think there needs to be further explanation of that?

Barry