IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Sun, 15 July 2018 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54B3130E68 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PN6H9v_TNmqh for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 12:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail4.verisign.com (mail4.verisign.com [69.58.187.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BC2A130E01 for <regext@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 12:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=3282; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1531683794; h=from:to:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject; bh=aIFjzPYfLdVLAKhzU3fKa5XchdmSXQwERNQJ4ptOqKY=; b=VUy7BgBsGGDNdSum2eHWSCUsYtyEcd3b2d5NijUuUDCY8WilE5GI22eg aE+S3L9vMGAk29kJ+KX12pY8dkrAR2lICextwBYmhOHIyBtkvs5WVEtt5 LfUyk3hUQXAs48PjGOzBiOiPk/N6toxkgHTUL3737aV6fEPiKfAGt2cyn rHSRDJOz2mAfKjnYBCV4ZIQkp6zsyEkL9o9dbz0ulVb1bCVY3DkB++ASJ TtcaJjt3ZoPmJIclCYuDxH4C3giXKsusTmhldYrpFtxbD70Q4Z5L/E/y9 qpAhyHXBmZezGOOTHsxhXJEFjMm6meMZ6yxQWs9+uQXt1R+CVUoOH5WSR w==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,358,1526356800"; d="scan'208";a="5221766"
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:GJxfUhACzc52U/u4Zrk0UyQJP3N1i/DPJgcQr6AfoPdwSP35p8iwAkXT6L1XgUPTWs2DsrQY07SQ6/iocFdDyK7JiGoFfp1IWk1NouQttCtkPvS4D1bmJuXhdS0wEZcKflZk+3amLRodQ56mNBXdrXKo8DEdBAj0OxZrKeTpAI7SiNm82/yv95HJbAhEmDuwbaluIBmqsA7cqtQYjYx+J6gr1xDHuGFIe+NYxWNpIVKcgRPx7dqu8ZBg7ipdpesv+9ZPXqvmcas4S6dYDCk9PGAu+MLrrxjDQhCR6XYaT24bjwBHAwnB7BH9Q5fxri73vfdz1SWGIcH7S60/VDK/5KlpVRDokj8KOT4n/m/Klsx+gqFVoByjqBx+34Hab46aOeFifqzGf9MWWXZNUtpTWiFHH4iyb5EPD+0EPetAoYXzpVwOrR+6BQayAuPg0SFHiWP13aEizu8vDB3J3As8H9ISvnjfsdL4NLwSUeCyyKnIySvMb/VN1jjj9IfIcQssoe+SUrJqcMrR0kgvFwzDjlmKtYPlODaV2/0LvmOG4eRgUuevhHQmqwF3ujWg2MgthZPMhoINzlDL6z91z5oyJd29TkNwfN2qEINIui2HK4d6WN4uTmNmtSog17ELuZC2cDIFxZkj3xLTduCLf5KV7h/hSOqdOyp0iX1mdb6lmhq/8lCsyuPiWcS3zFpHqy9In9vQuXwRzRPe79WLRedh8Uqk2TuAyh7c6u9BLE0wiKXUNoAuz7gtnZQJq0vDBDX5mEDuga+TcUUr5/an5vz8YrXjup+cL4h0ihziMqg2msywH+A4Mg8WUmWG5eqyzKDv8k3hTrtFj/I6jrfVvIrEJcsHoa65GRdV3pw55BmiFTumzs4YnWIBLF5fZB2HiI3pN0nPIPD+E/i/n0yhnCp3y/zcI7HsAJvAImLenLrhc7tx8UFRxQ4rwdBa/Z1UC7UBIPzpWk/2sdzVFgQ5Mwyzw+bjDNVyyIUeVnmRDaCFM6PfqkGI6fw1I+mNf48VuTn9K/4/6/Hyin85nEcRfbO10psPdHC4AvNmLl2DbnXxmNgBFHwHvgw5TOzxlF2CSyNTZ3OoU60g4TE7DZqsDZ3fSYC1nLyBwCC7E4VMZm9YBVCDD3jpd5mfVvcNdi2SPsFhniYDVbi7RI8rzQuuuxPiy7p7MurU/TUVuo/51Ndv6e3TiQg+9T1qAMSB3WGBVnt0kX0HRzAo06F/vVVxyk2e3qdim/xUDNtT6OhLUggkKZHc0/V2C8zoVQLOZdqJVFGmQtKiATEqVN4xwsEBY1pzG9m4iRDDxSWqUPcpkOnBS5U4+6f02X/qO9xgzjDN06xuxRFyS8dGMEWggbVj7RXWQYXOlhPd3+zlb6kT0T7R3GaO0WTIu1tXH0Q4Bb/IUn0PemPXoMj3oETYQOnqQf5oPhFIx9LHK6ZWZJjzgFpLVOumItjXeye2kWW9DgrN2rqDRJbtfGEGmiTQFEZClBocsjzOYQQkDym95mPTEDIrD1/gblPwtPNyoWv+SUU2wgqWKlFo2JKp/RkRnrqdRu8dmLUet3FyhS9zGQP3/9XSD9eGrQdqf+EUWtg6/EsNnTbCtwt5OpGmJa1phXYAfh52pELh0VN8DYAWwptil28j0AcncfHQ61hGbT7NhZ0=
X-IPAS-Result: A2GwBwCOoktb/zGZrQpcGwEBAQEDAQEBCQEBAYQsgScKg3GWSIMqDpIBgXoLIwuEPgIXglo2FgECAQEBAQEBAgEBAoEFDII1IhFLagEBAQEBASMCQDABAQEBAx0GEVEEAgEIEQQBAQECAiYCAgIwFQgIAgQBEgiDGYIOqGqBLoo4BYELiU8+gRGDEYd8glUCmVwDBgKGCIkVgUuGfoUkh32CPIc0AgQCBAUCFIFIAoICcIM5giUXg0WKUm+LO4EaAQE
Received: from BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1466.3; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 15:43:12 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([fe80::7c0a:1cc:5def:9dde]) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([fe80::7c0a:1cc:5def:9dde%4]) with mapi id 15.01.1466.003; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 15:43:12 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "'adam@nostrum.com'" <adam@nostrum.com>, "'regext@ietf.org'" <regext@ietf.org>, "'draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag@tools.ietf.org'" <draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag
Thread-Index: AQHT/NKp89PZq5HFB0qu/2SRU84EiqSPScpWgAGkaMA=
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 19:43:12 +0000
Message-ID: <b85444c893094f6cb0adb5bf925dc01d@verisign.com>
References: <7426e645-9de3-20ed-f4c4-7e1f46703233@nostrum.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F7FA73B18@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <02b19628-470c-124c-1fb1-8c622e3bd592@nostrum.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F7FA7533B@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <66aaa434-de52-f763-0a99-052f59306e8f@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <66aaa434-de52-f763-0a99-052f59306e8f@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/x58f7AR1HBJdLiPT8lNrojO3sjY>
Subject: Re: [regext] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 19:43:17 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2018 2:37 PM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com>; Hollenbeck, Scott
> <shollenbeck@verisign.com>; 'regext@ietf.org' <regext@ietf.org>; 'draft-
> ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag@tools.ietf.org' <draft-ietf-regext-rdap-
> object-tag@tools.ietf.org>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-
> tag
>
> On 6/6/18 06:56, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
> ....
> >>>> I read the text as calling for implementors to concatenate "XXXX-
> YYYY"
> >>>> to the
> >>>> end of the IANA-registered base URL ("https://example.com/rdap/"),
> >>>> resulting in "https://example.com/rdap/XXXX-YYYY". The example
> >>>> instead shows "https://example.com/rdap/entity/XXXX-YYY". Is the
> >>>> inclusion of "entity/" in this example an error?
> >>> No, it's not an error. That’s the path segment that 7482 describes
> >>> for
> >> entity queries. I can see how my text above might be confusing,
> >> though, so how about this wording instead?
> >>> OLD:
> >>> "The base RDAP URL is concatenated to the entity handle to create a
> >> complete RDAP query path segment of
> >> "https://example.com/rdap/entity/XXXX-
> >> YYYY""
> >>> NEW:
> >>> "The RDAP query URL is formed using the base RDAP URL and entity
> >>> path
> >> segment described in Section 3.1.5 of RFC 7482, using "XXXX-YYY" as
> >> the value of the handle identifier. The complete RDAP query URL
> >> becomes "https://example.com/rdap/entity/XXXX-YYYY"."
> >>
> >> That seems good.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the explanations. Based on what you've said, I think this
> >> is ready for IETF last call -- you can treat my comment for
> >> clarification of the example as an IETF last call comment, and
> >> address it along with any other feedback you receive during last call.
> > Will do - thanks!
>
> IETF Last Call has concluded, and I didn't see any other comments that
> would necessitate changes in the document. Just to make sure we're on the
> same page, I'm waiting on a -04 version of the document reflecting the
> above change prior to asking for the IESG to ballot on the document.
> Let me know if that's not what you expect.

Thanks. Yes, I'll update it in the next day or so.

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email