Re: [regext] Security Lock anyone? (Was: Preliminary agenda for Prague, and call for agenda items)

Kal Feher <ietf@feherfamily.org> Mon, 25 February 2019 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@feherfamily.org>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DE6130EE6 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:51:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zKnnE3ilD5Md for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from indigo.securenic.net (li90-55.members.linode.com [74.207.248.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1911912894E for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:51:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by indigo.securenic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935876700B for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:51:25 +1100 (AEDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at securenic.net
Received: from indigo.securenic.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (indigo.securenic.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V_kPEKAP7_hw for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:51:25 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: from Brussels.local (c49-177-68-250.eburwd8.vic.optusnet.com.au [49.177.68.250]) by indigo.securenic.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A3546700A for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:51:23 +1100 (AEDT)
To: regext@ietf.org
References: <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE0759FBF8765@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at>
From: Kal Feher <ietf@feherfamily.org>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=ietf@feherfamily.org; keydata= mQENBFtz9XEBCAD2uTgg4OvehOlyellLS2prQpjmrMP6eck6Ow40GNZrqsM9XTCF1KRh1XmE qHHSEswbyoHia6mYfXrG/5lHjeisgVK6cqw2CpzyR+i/PhFbqjtiEQsWuiKa72hcW6J95TNL XEBvbcNHIkl1VOCbfKuMhqbtqoEfUWlsPdM/W5Vk/6OboY81VIPxpIws5Db8TIODjBEcKmhe BmkoIcsztHbo+p2uM7B2kyi9MzBFVYMeGF6IQTdinCw7WCBE8Jrmx645oQ/TNGT+//WXXTrU 5wajmHdNEYWa0muT/IhKstvU6K0/fWRfwQaQ4sdKAzJ+/8xu+A7xiPYBJq/7MHcpTIUfABEB AAG0IEthbCBGZWhlciA8aWV0ZkBmZWhlcmZhbWlseS5vcmc+iQFUBBMBCAA+FiEEce3bjehV CDyQmzspY20IgJ75NrcFAltz9XICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AA CgkQY20IgJ75Nrekgwf/Ubn9ADzWrkcdAx3UAbhpA0SSrnKA5KaZrzDdjQf85nUfw2hWLARs zEyhpgqcPoU6mSAcdUHcmufHPf2ovOpIzHlHNrsDmGbcU1ScLaVBrGcZJ3J9W5SbyJH5Repa bKildHVY5wn/FyB+KTBUD3pJ6VUhVqUvQhfBi3KN0moCfe77W8EpdCOifZ6m6mv8o9/xDArY xLJR9PAJto1wxMz1WznhTz5A7QiMTgHeeh5OYKz79pihUZPUCQY0oxhBDeK+bAtNl7I07vR6 XSqtM4chm6Zr4YV/QeugX8/Xj2OMxnQLqdnnwC8YhwNConEKalW7XEKb962ZS8/jbitkSaFq VbkBDQRbc/VxAQgAwwHuWHsRk+56J3XACM4H0uZsunNU+Ic1nDQ/eVSLbHoYU3slSk+TbV/Z CV+pzYAJL3aRVDUFIlpeN7M3cmx23kgtIjzL9KdbZYKJ9QdFOrGht1S/iyFApmEWHVOjPegb gnaHzLKyJJGwTofjfhoz2yQG4JidRt11yGpsJ+Yd3FR7NeQiJy8gVmzcnmqBtw18nJstrEmE tIg4QGMgvSw4SfenoQh4S/kTW3aD1fQyFVDr/dhNuWdZom6D8GeOLvcpviLnFtcPyl7w4KuQ zwZPDhDTOt4eY8VKsyPdc3o8K5oL4hIx9IUVioQglxb5SRlLm+ihhUwp78+S0PxfzjBo6wAR AQABiQE8BBgBCAAmFiEEce3bjehVCDyQmzspY20IgJ75NrcFAltz9XECGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ Y20IgJ75NrfSIQf+KshlrOAryQNJqAb2p+9XGamIHWvk/r6KVSDx16WI3F6VxlPCvnzKcOkM Lo8yBR28065fodAK6FWiK/PGv6wSNm5rXoEdishAtn4aH36hwFsNeQ3t5zbzj8LhuP0wf/xf 1I/5rSY8YSg2eW0/dMRKA+PTjLwlj/6nbVgjf9C3p2GiAPMDl49XVGpb5G8+C0GNarl7CFZz 7T9DVbwFKaM9u/a5ZVky9wZF6HzVxTkxPse28R1XvHfAafnfj+zWfiI8q0i/ALKDUOXxBpLY BGwWeqxIsnl6C4v65nHpGjeRfWwx+Nk8T85fI7aANsbIbmwAbX/hkzRd8tLLftUa2K3gqA==
Message-ID: <29d24896-ef8c-05bb-23f2-9faf79aa2b74@feherfamily.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:51:19 +1100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE0759FBF8765@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1W4iCKWfia5mdkw6BCDpKnRwLcRpuuj8p"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/xIYGy61uJr2-3Xs4PDiFH42kq2w>
Subject: Re: [regext] Security Lock anyone? (Was: Preliminary agenda for Prague, and call for agenda items)
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:51:29 -0000

I won't be at Prague, but this is certainly a topic I'm interested in.

On 25/2/19 6:26 pm, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:
>
> Antoin, all,
>
>  
>
> for now this is more a question / request to the group, rather than a
> specific agenda slot request – but:
>
>  
>
> In the light of the recent attacks on registration interfaces, do we
> want to take a fresh look at standardization of “Registry Lock” /
> “Security Lock”. There’s some previous work on this topic (see
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wallstrom-epp-registrant-problem-statement-00).
> As Patrick pointed out, there’s also some IPR considerations in this
> area (See his blog post at
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20150603_registry_lock_or_epp_with_two_factor_authentication/).
>
>  
>
> I constantly hear from registrars that “Security Lock” (our product
> name) would be much more attractive if there wasn’t a myriad of
> different processes at each registry – so my take is that there’s room
> for standardization (which probably goes beyond the pure EPP
> extension).  I’m also hearing some fellow ccTLD colleages are
> interesting in a common “profile”.
>
> Would regext be the right spot for such a discussion? If yes, would it
> be interesting to hold a 20 minutes slot in Prague? Or even a Bar-BoF
> before we “report back” to the working group?
>
>  
>
> Best,
>
> Alex
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *Von:*regext <regext-bounces@ietf.org> *Im Auftrag von *Antoin Verschuren
> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 24. Februar 2019 14:43
> *An:* Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org>
> *Betreff:* [regext] Preliminary agenda for Prague, and call for agenda
> items
>
>  
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find the preliminary agenda for Prague attached.
> I hope I captured everyone that has requested time to speak. If not,
> let the chairs know.
> We still have a little bit of time left on the agenda, so if you have
> urgent agenda items, let us know as well.
> If you are on the agenda, start preparing ;-)
>
>
>
>
> Regards, Jim and Antoin
>
> - -- 
> Antoin Verschuren
>
> Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
> M: +31 6 37682392
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

-- 
Kal Feher
Melbourne, Australia