[regext] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-17: (with COMMENT)
Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 21 September 2020 06:52 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: regext@ietf.org
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF27C3A149B; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 23:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging@ietf.org, regext-chairs@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org, Tom Harrison <tomh@apnic.net>, tomh@apnic.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.17.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <160067112251.12952.1125516822255123517@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 23:52:02 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/y3xlSFhXQw28j-AxHmp4OSMnJwQ>
Subject: [regext] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 06:52:03 -0000
Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-17: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [[ comments ]] [ section 2.3 ] * My current understanding is that it's not possible to request a sort by IP address in general (i.e. without regard to IP address family). Otherwise, since some IPv6 addresses (admittedly not any within the current 2000::/3 GUA space) might be numerically less then some IPv4 addresses, I think there would probably need to be some text around relative ordering between IPv4 and IPv6 addresses regardless of numerical equivalent values. But again: my reading is that sort can only be by ipV4 or ipV6 (and not just some generalized "ip" parameter), so this shouldn't be necessary. [[ nits ]] [ section 2.1 ] * s/value of sort "parameter"/value of the "sort" parameter/ perhaps? [ section 2.4 ] * I think the cursor value "b2Zmc2V0PTEwMCxsaW1pdD01MAo=" might decode to 'offset=100,limit=50\n' (with a trailing newline). The base64 encoding without the trailing newline might be 'b2Zmc2V0PTEwMCxsaW1pdD01MA==', but someone should double-check me on that.
- [regext] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Erik Kline via Datatracker
- Re: [regext] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-i… Mario Loffredo
- Re: [regext] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-i… Barry Leiba
- Re: [regext] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-i… Mario Loffredo