[regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-03

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Tue, 18 June 2024 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9829C1D6219 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rhEWQbWU4X4I for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail6.verisign.com (mail6.verisign.com [69.58.187.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A41DC1CAE90 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=5912; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1718732486; h=from:to:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject; bh=6J2jaApxhh1VGeS4HhPUyB+NhWMW2L9oLJtWnWV41kA=; b=Mtz7Yz35xKiHt+ZdNgProhCLYQYjfodUvq9YoffwddO6C85xSNJfquze ul2TyydJlTxCTJ0U+xA8o3pJB2AssVGWI7sy6derCDP1OemAajt+G1QRJ ZNtj8VlGjP8NmrhSExjtDcSIYgfKkgPv3yeEDaj8xv9eNYkZp87wdju2V +CgWk8FEsH53mmN19Ai60mEb8qLb6Zh0dV2vIVrhuj65vDkTkODJ6xFJL af56ig8tlg/JHgNbGqJ+EL7/djTM98wJeMZtEKA4tDDdQlJsHk/0qvVYc iOb19OWqKLHEi1DwqoLGswqWxbi3D5w4ls39XYVIaDvhcrE8xFGyimxhj A==;
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: IlrV5DotRRyCR2tU8QTSKQ==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: I2UfDahSRTqKF8d0mXdNkQ==
X-ThreatScanner-Verdict: Negative
IronPort-Data: A9a23:FFmenq/nZyK3v4yZ5FwNDrUDhX+TJUtcMsCJ2f8bNWPcYEJGY0x3y WJLCjuGP/7YZWWkf9oibtuxoRgAv5/WmIA1SwJt/HwxFiIbosf7XtnIdU2Y0wF+jCHgZBk+s 5hBMImowOQcFCK0SsKFa+C5xZVE/fjVAOe6UaicZ30ZqTZMEE8JkQhkl/MynrlmiN24BxLlk d7pqqUzAnf8s9JPGjxSs/LrRC9H5qyo5GtG5wxmPpingXeF/5UrJMNHTU2OByagKmVkNrbSb /rOyri/4lTY838FYvu5kqz2e1E9WbXbOw6DkBJ+A8BOVTAb+0Teeo5iXBYtQR8/Zwehxrid+ /0U3XCEcjrFC4WX8Agre0IBT3whZ/0uFIjvehBTueTLp6HPWyW0n6U2VCnaN6VAkgp8KTkmG fD1tFnhx/1M7g676OvTdwViuigsBOjvJr1ClnZ89wvIJsx8Xa2TepnxxuYNiV/chugWdRrfT +AjT2NQSjnwO0QJJFwQEop4levumGPkdXtTr1f9SagfujCVlVMqluGwa5yJKrRmRu0M9qqcj nnG+GD9DxcQOdec4SSI6HO3h+DJ2yj8Xer+EZXjr6Ix2wTKnAT/DjU3D2a1jfC5sXSCQvFxe 0BM/xoii6sLoRnDot7VGkfQTGS/lh0bRNNUEu4S5AyLy6GS7wvxLnIJQTNRdPQnudM4Azsw2 Te0c8jBDyZp6aKTRGLFr/KPsyn0PCkOaGUFIyUeS1JD/cP4psc4iRenostfLZNZR+bdQVnYq w1mZgBn71nPpabnD5mGwG0=
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:oDo8UKsCcqRMVxU0KzOvRcbX7skDq9V00zEX/kB9WHVpm6uj5q WTdZUgpH3JYVkqOE3I9ervBEDiexzhHPdOiOEs1NyZLWrbUQWTTb1K3M/NzzrtACXi+uMY/r cIScRDIey1KVRhl8717E2bH8ZI+rO62ZHtoevF1X9iQUVRdqd6425CZzqzCEFsWwVcP5Y/Ga ed4sYvnVGdRUg=
X-Talos-CUID: 9a23:ULv3cGsjdbCTlll8p0RcIpRN6IsEdmfjkVvXP3WCGE1TEqGoGWasw4Bdxp8=
X-Talos-MUID: 9a23:zUH/MAS4cn46g3U0RXTN3gxsGM5o2J6SEWMjwZlevvmIEy9JbmI=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,247,1712620800"; d="scan'208";a="31433112"
Received: from BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) by BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.37; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:41:25 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.173.153.49]) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.173.153.49]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.037; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:41:24 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "kowalik@denic.de" <kowalik@denic.de>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-03
Thread-Index: AQHawZkD0GMawBl8WEOGizcIMfu8SbHNycKQ
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 17:41:24 +0000
Message-ID: <fcf99aa6d7ba45d9a55defdd3f0281a4@verisign.com>
References: <591E988C-2F3E-45CA-9E43-874C50CD0F5B@elistx.com> <a3b3ef1e-0fb5-44d5-bae0-1209acabfc02@denic.de> <8b50206930d040cca57dfeef1d0b5144@verisign.com> <42e9b5c1-a064-40b1-af7a-2e55110c2abf@denic.de>
In-Reply-To: <42e9b5c1-a064-40b1-af7a-2e55110c2abf@denic.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: IDVBS6XNALXK26GQ5YFLEOXFWDKWRPLN
X-Message-ID-Hash: IDVBS6XNALXK26GQ5YFLEOXFWDKWRPLN
X-MailFrom: shollenbeck@verisign.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-regext.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-03
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/yGSyOYZlteIFhn4CCt9M_nvrWKY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:regext-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:regext-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:regext-leave@ietf.org>

Section 5 already identifies the practices as observed or not, but we can add clarity by splitting it into two sections. We can also update the abstract. Thanks for the feedback.

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: kowalik@denic.de <kowalik@denic.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 12:03 PM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com>; regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-
> 03
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> Splitting Section 5 into "Current Practices" and "Proposed experimental
> Practices" would offer a lot of more clarity in this respect.
>
> Also abstract is not mentioning proposed practices:
>
> "This document describes best practices to delete domain and host objects
> that reduce the risk of DNS resolution failure and maintain client-server data
> consistency."
>
> I would change to:
> "This document describes best current practices as well as proposes new
> experimental practices to delete domain and host objects that reduce the risk
> of DNS resolution failure and maintain client-server data consistency.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Pawel
>
> On 18.06.24 17:46, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> > Pawel, the document already describes known practices, their issues, and
> those that are proposed, along with analysis of how they're thought to be
> better. What's missing?
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: kowalik@denic.de <kowalik@denic.de>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 11:36 AM
> >> To: regext@ietf.org
> >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Re: WGLC:
> >> draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-03
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> In the course of the actual discussion on the clarity of documents we
> >> produce, especially related to implementation maturity of the
> >> solutions I would need to repeat the remark I brought up during the call for
> adoption [1].
> >>
> >> I think the document, being a BCP, should be very specific about
> >> which methods have already been field proven and which are kind of
> >> experimental with unknown implementation or operational impact.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1WmRFtKB8RXzAHuXHoN-OpHA3vOlG-
> >>
> G0Gpki1ow4L_ezX0s3WaHnOjI1vjfr3mJJj49Wx2QArJxHz_7WstL3WUkGvQXd
> >> O_QI2Mxh_wKKA9UvoWj_UJUlybSsh9WVIQK4h2Hcc-
> >>
> LRehJ7_1E2xmP1iH5FpdEdMxrN2CGNIlFnFVDNyoiPSKZ_xANApbBjCnW1gXU
> >> pEpbFO4TVSXTFbYeTzWmJT3PHkqzw4dmncdVrCbGbV8b99WCfG2c-
> >>
> ahrgqfi1TBuravVfcBrC61Q9oNp2QGP5FzDQ9hbP2gAR93uA0CSo/https%3A
> >>
> %2F%2Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fregext%2FlDkYhEak6_JehglG
> >> -YuqxBpwgrw%2F
> >>
> >> Kind Regards,
> >>
> >> Pawel
> >>
> >> On 03.06.24 16:56, James Galvin wrote:
> >>> The document editors have indicated that the following document is
> >>> ready
> >> for submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Best
> >> Current
> >> Practice:
> >>> Best Practices for Deletion of Domain and Host Objects in the
> >>> Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
> >>> https://secure-
> >> web.cisco.com/1kPqjqwCJfsCxQHvBeBU74pCSqzTWdJQ6jZ6RQm7-
> >>
> 2mcVf8pmghWjgEJRqVdkFppbs7M_HiHAE7CVQJzMEmDrBQgrLJGI5WUGwC
> >> 1rsVWeoAzVgC
> >>
> MgBrz_tOOZZ_yWsmaNrvKsCiYCAcKk34iXfGeMuD9YljauXP4IJOs_ATrkUln1aa
> >> Ezd61l
> >>
> pawefS7VAbs77M4BMKMb1NWfX_heCB1wqcD1HYXnSkD203cWebWfQKgj
> >> 5C8DWHYMuKHwud
> >>
> dFtPJJaxGWQA_qb0xjiiL9S3sLb2CbefBMEsC2aAwis4YLx2E/https%3A%2F%2F
> >> datatr
> >>> acker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp%2F03%2F
> >>>
> >>> Please indicate your support or no objection for the publication of
> >>> this
> >> document by replying to this message on list (a simple “+1” is sufficient).
> >>> If any working group member has questions regarding the publication
> >>> of this
> >> document please respond on the list with your concerns by close of
> >> business everywhere, Monday, 17 June 2024.
> >>> If there are no objections the document will be submitted to the IESG.
> >>>
> >>> The Document Shepherd for this document is Andy Newton.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Antoin and Jim
> >>> REGEXT WG Co-Chairs
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email
> >>> to regext-leave@ietf.org