Re: [Widex] Proposed rewording for Framework draft

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Rosfran Lins Borges wrote:

>
>    After reading all the recent discussions, and reviewing again the Widex 
> framework draft, I would like to suggest a better rephrasing to the last 
> paragraph from section 4.2:
>
> "4.2.  WO.Event Message
>
>   The WO.Event messages are primarily used to carry events triggered on
> (...)
>   interface.
>
>   Note: Some UI markup languages, e.g.  Glade [1], do not have events
>   defined at document level and therefore WO.Event messages MUST be
>   able to serialize the events emitted by the associated libraries,
>   e.g.  GTK+ [2]."
>
>
> Would changes to:
>
>   "Note: Some UI markup languages, e.g.  Glade [1], which are 
> originally designed for only working with standalone UI 
> architectures (i.e., that doesn't implements a networked MVC, 
> where we have a change-propagation mechanism that ensures 
> consistency between remotelly-located user interface and model), 
> and do not have a defined syntax for event modeling (at least, not 
> at document level), this kind of UI event was not originally made 
> to be carried as a string of bits through the network. So, when 
> using Widex with these applications, the WO.Event messages MUST be 
> able to serialize the events (where "events" would means "GTK+ 
> signals") emitted by its associated UI libraries, e.g. GTK+ [2]."

I think I get your intention, but the wording you suggest is a 
little hard to read with all the bracketed clauses.

  Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>  W3C lead for multimodal interaction
  http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett +44 1225 866240 (or 867351)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEmr7qb3AdEmxAsUsRAqsEAJ9WU+KwFjFq+cLrY59+i53E2IAAZQCfUtnF
hlUOBG1uimF4fN6efqFTGjk=
=LTdT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Widex mailing list
Widex@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/widex