Re: [renum] Announcing the imminent closure of 6renum...
Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Mon, 07 October 2013 23:06 UTC
Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: renum@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: renum@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5112121E80CC for <renum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 16:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NegUYsEa6c3j for <renum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 16:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE74121E80D0 for <renum@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 16:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost.ecs.soton.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r97N5xas000804; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 00:05:59 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk r97N5xas000804
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1381187160; bh=wc5Ts6ferQWQ/Tvngs7h7qQe8AE=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=sjnQf12PY/9C2tWz37hzYSRe6bhPrZHLBMaKexXQv6i/TOWgml8+KTnj3dZhyhcFr GFUJYSggQOWfacwWAcO+XH52P8BIvOG8+7l3i1Xk73kS+LGZ7fwJhyFDB4lKU6xjx7 JJVpoNHvtfq7deF5DZRq7adpjOhouedCHpF6UJJw=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:401]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:68da]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id p9705x05445413192F ret-id none; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:06:00 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.107] (host213-123-213-183.in-addr.btopenworld.com [213.123.213.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r97N5hd3026629 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 00:05:43 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C179773B-109A-43F4-BAA5-A15D41EAA33D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <7338814F-9FB3-4D65-8216-3F02D8C7A8B1@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:05:42 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|0614f3e331ed22eb2c13ddc7275baa92p9705x03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|D13FEB56-698D-456B-8531-A9DEB551286B@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <7338814F-9FB3-4D65-8216-3F02D8C7A8B1@bogus.com> <D13FEB56-698D-456B-8531-A9DEB551286B@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=p9705x054454131900; tid=p9705x05445413192F; client=relay,forged,no_ptr,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=4:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: r97N5xas000804
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Cc: "renum@ietf.org" <renum@ietf.org>, 6renum-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [renum] Announcing the imminent closure of 6renum...
X-BeenThere: renum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Renumbering discussion mailing list." <renum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/renum>, <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/renum>
List-Post: <mailto:renum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/renum>, <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 23:06:16 -0000
On 7 Oct 2013, at 23:30, joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote: > Greeting 6renum folks, > > At this points we've got our milestones complete and the last of the documents is out the door. > > we have the following RFCs to show for the effort. > > RFC 6866 Problem Statement for Renumbering IPv6 Hosts with Static Addresses in Enterprise Networks > RFC 6879 IPv6 Enterprise Network Renumbering Scenarios, Considerations, and Methods > RFC 7010 IPv6 Site Renumbering Gap Analysis > > Some level of hard-work is now behind us with the completion of the working group's charter. More is ahead of us since the gaps to be addressed need to be pursued outside of this working group. > > With those efforts ongoing or ahead of us and in coordination with the WG chairs and authors I plan to close down the working group. The mailing list will remain open so long as it remains useful for coordination of related and future activities. > > Thank you all for your diligent efforts. Many thanks to Joel and Ron for the WG steer from above, and helping push the RFCs out the door, and to all the participants who made contributions. It was good to revisit the topic and make some more positive steps forward. We encourage participants to progress the open identified gaps in relevant WGs, and to discuss those issues here on renum@ietf.org when required. A reminder of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-6renum-next-steps-00, which contains some future work. Tim