Re: [renum] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6renum-enterprise-05.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 21 December 2012 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: renum@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: renum@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C60321F8B29 for <renum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:53:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.604
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UOMPgktBZSFl for <renum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:53:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C3921F8775 for <renum@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:53:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hm11so5086043wib.8 for <renum@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:53:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=f2DPHiIHubXQmoQh0BGjOfR1CUuc/uzqgSktfsil6XE=; b=GQYbNUbPXJCz0dR0O7wih4j7HHJncpjGsifwogKmPaLj5TkIpaDzI+gPnJ9LVZ2VCT h1Xwtgooe+7Qlyyvk8sU32uPLN3B92RGebfbDbRDi0N5lr3E2cvPZkbVWrONFsrUI9Z5 GRj3pJbnBHrAGllyDzrDziKEcyC0ygVHy4eWd29JXzbMTIcRiaTatpRYAQRRBq9D+Je8 Fcm+VtJdadmY2+O9webFujZmnMISeIMzR9tRx/JTwexkNcHxsZm2XeiNGWC57KJZoH0A /2ILK3sj88KBu0Jit72NMQP62wlc+YBhONcJThczJgNiuvZ1+q/mtmoyol+CsFNrbjOo 2z8A==
X-Received: by 10.180.101.99 with SMTP id ff3mr23281437wib.21.1356098037089; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:53:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host-2-102-219-97.as13285.net. [2.102.219.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id df2sm20731094wib.0.2012.12.21.05.53.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:53:55 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50D46A01.4000903@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:54:09 +0000
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: renum@ietf.org
References: <20121221085701.6227.80317.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121221085701.6227.80317.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [renum] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6renum-enterprise-05.txt
X-BeenThere: renum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Renumbering discussion mailing list." <renum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/renum>, <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/renum>
List-Post: <mailto:renum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/renum>, <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:53:59 -0000

WG,

This update is in response to Last Call and IESG comments. Here are a few notes:

Reacting to several reviewers, we clarified scope (analysis and description of
current methods) and reduced "BCP" language that confused the scope. Also
numerous editorial corrections.

Substantial reorganisation of the DNS section to improve logic and readability.

Apps Area review - clarified comments on application servers
and use of FQDN.

Martin Stiemerling's review - clarified discussion of black list
issue according to security area review.

OPS-DIR review -
 "[RFC4057] needs to be a Normative Reference" - not possible, it's an Informational RFC.

 "Have suggestions for verifying correct operation been discussed?" - paragraph added to
 section 4.3.

Benoit Claise's review - clarified scope, then

 "Section 1, paragraph 1

   However, widespread use of PI might
   create serious BGP4 scaling problems

 A reference, or a small explanation, would be welcome "

It's unfortunate that the RRG did not produce an RFC on BGP scaling problems.
We can refer to RFC 4116 but it isn't ideal.

SECDIR review - all points have been adopted

Regards
   Brian, Sheng, Bing


On 21/12/2012 08:57, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Site Renumbering Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : IPv6 Enterprise Network Renumbering Scenarios, Considerations and Methods
> 	Author(s)       : Sheng Jiang
>                           Bing Liu
>                           Brian Carpenter
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-6renum-enterprise-05.txt
> 	Pages           : 17
> 	Date            : 2012-12-21
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document analyzes events that cause renumbering and describes
>    the current renumbering methods. These are described in three
>    categories: those applicable during network design, those applicable
>    during preparation for renumbering, and those applicable during the
>    renumbering operation.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6renum-enterprise
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6renum-enterprise-05
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6renum-enterprise-05
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>