[renum] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-05.txt> (IPv6 Site Renumbering Gap Analysis) to Informational RFC

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Wed, 27 March 2013 13:14 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: renum@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: renum@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE13821F90B3 for <renum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.358
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.242, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z+s6+nMJ2UyC; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E00F21F907D; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IANA <drafts-lastcall@icann.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.43
X-IETF-Draft-string: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis
X-IETF-Draft-revision: 05
Message-ID: <20130327131419.19563.49025.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:14:19 -0700
Cc: renum@ietf.org
Subject: [renum] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-05.txt> (IPv6 Site Renumbering Gap Analysis) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: renum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: noreply@ietf.org
List-Id: "Renumbering discussion mailing list." <renum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/renum>, <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/renum>
List-Post: <mailto:renum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/renum>, <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:14:19 -0000

The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Site Renumbering WG
(6renum) to consider the following document:
- 'IPv6 Site Renumbering Gap Analysis'
  <draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-05.txt> as Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-04-10. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   This document briefly introduces the existing mechanisms that could
   be utilized for IPv6 site renumbering and tries to cover most of the
   explicit issues and requirements of IPv6 renumbering. Through the gap
   analysis, the document provides a basis for future works that
   identify and develop solutions or to stimulate such development as
   appropriate. The gap analysis is presented following a renumbering
   event procedure summary.






The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.