Re: [renum] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6renum-enterprise-05.txt

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Fri, 21 December 2012 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: renum@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: renum@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68A321F86C0 for <renum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:45:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iue8Cv0IEWfP for <renum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:45:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com [130.76.64.129]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D03A21F86A1 for <renum@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:45:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id qBLHjOD7016113 for <renum@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:45:24 -0800
Received: from XCH-NWHT-03.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-03.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.71.23]) by slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id qBLHjNtK016104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:45:23 -0800
Received: from XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.64.97]) by XCH-NWHT-03.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.71.23]) with mapi; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:45:23 -0800
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:45:19 -0800
Thread-Topic: [renum] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6renum-enterprise-05.txt
Thread-Index: Ac3fi+CvPr4bpRIGTzCaS2KKV0ozJAAFrixA
Message-ID: <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65E0EE59ABD@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <20121221085701.6227.80317.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <50D46A01.4000903@gmail.com> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033A5253EE@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <50D47975.7000002@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50D47975.7000002@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: No
Cc: "renum@ietf.org" <renum@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [renum] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6renum-enterprise-05.txt
X-BeenThere: renum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Renumbering discussion mailing list." <renum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/renum>, <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/renum>
List-Post: <mailto:renum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/renum>, <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:45:28 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: renum-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:renum-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 7:00 AM
> To: George, Wes
> Cc: renum@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [renum] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6renum-enterprise-05.txt
> 
> Wes,
> 
> On 21/12/2012 14:42, George, Wes wrote:
> >> From: renum-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:renum-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> >
> >> Benoit Claise's review - clarified scope, then
> >>
> >>  "Section 1, paragraph 1
> >>
> >>    However, widespread use of PI might
> >>    create serious BGP4 scaling problems
> >>
> >>  A reference, or a small explanation, would be welcome "
> >>
> >> It's unfortunate that the RRG did not produce an RFC on BGP scaling
> >> problems.
> > [WEG] They didn't? While RRG didn't come to consensus on a *solution*,
> there was consensus documented about several aspects of the problem space
> that should serve as the necessary level of background reading to support
> this assertion.
> 
> Personally I wish that draft-narten-radir-problem-statement had
> become an RFC. The published RRG documents say rather little about
> the root causes of the scaling problem.

Agree.

> >> We can refer to RFC 4116 but it isn't ideal.
> > [WEG]
> > You may find better reference points in RFC4984, 6227, or even 6115.
> 
> I think that 6227 is the best of those for this purpose.

Also agree. IMHO, RFC6115 shows bias and was a snapsot-in-time
before all ideas were fully developed.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com
 
> Thanks
>     Brian
> _______________________________________________
> renum mailing list
> renum@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/renum