[Research-funding] IETF and Govt Funding

"Bush, Stephen F (Research)" <bushsf@crd.ge.com> Tue, 25 February 2003 18:44 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA10198 for <research-funding-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:44:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1PIs4U21072 for research-funding-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:54:04 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1PIs4p21069 for <research-funding-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:54:04 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA10147; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:44:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1PIs1p21060; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:54:01 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1PIrRp21043 for <research-funding@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:53:27 -0500
Received: from ext-nj2gw-1.online-age.net (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA10130 for <research-funding@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:43:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from int-nj2gw-1.online-age.net (int-nj2gw-1.online-age.net [3.159.236.65]) by ext-nj2gw-1.online-age.net (8.12.3/8.9.1/990426-RLH) with ESMTP id h1PIlf36012751 for <research-funding@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:47:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from crdns.crd.ge.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by int-nj2gw-1.online-age.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/990426-RLH) with ESMTP id h1PIlZpo009752 for <research-funding@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:47:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from exc01crdge.crd.ge.com (exc01crdge.crd.ge.com [3.1.116.47]) by crdns.crd.ge.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1PIlYk25575 for <research-funding@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:47:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: by exc01crdge.crd.ge.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <F1L1LJA3>; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:47:33 -0500
Message-ID: <E4AAC34FE3CF564D8AE89EB8AC333FD7069CCC91@XMB03CRDGE>
From: "Bush, Stephen F (Research)" <bushsf@crd.ge.com>
To: "'research-funding@ietf.org'" <research-funding@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2DCFE.5A24F144"
Subject: [Research-funding] IETF and Govt Funding
Sender: research-funding-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: research-funding-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: research-funding@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/research-funding>, <mailto:research-funding-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: draft-iab-research-funding feedback <research-funding.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:research-funding@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:research-funding-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/research-funding>, <mailto:research-funding-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/research-funding/>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:47:31 -0500

I enjoyed reading the research-funding draft and definitely agree with the spirit of the
document--i.e. longer-term focus 
for research. My concern is on the appropriateness of the IETF for this task:
 
[ The following are my own two-cents on the subject...]
 
My thought after reading the research-funding draft would be to let the Internet run in its current
manner even though there is no 
doubt that it has had a long and drastic decline in terms of innovation and vision. Based on my own
experience and those 
that I know, the IETF is perceived mostly as a standards community, not a research organization. I
would hate to think public 
money was being spent on standards bodies, especially specific IETF Working Groups. These should be
run by industrial 
organizations themselves as much as possible. I thought that was the intention of transitioning the
Internet away from government 
funding long ago. 
 
Instead, research funding would be better spent on innovative networking concepts coming from
creative new sources (non-IETF/non-IP) 
(some of which may still find their way into IETF standards). Perhaps if the IRTF were more active,
the IRTF might be a more palatable use 
of public funding although still questionable.
 
...would be glad to be convinced otherwise (via an updated draft)...

Stephen F Bush ( http://www.research.ge.com/~bushsf <http://www.research.ge.com/~bushsf> )