Re: [Resolverless-dns] Paper on Resolver-less DNS

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 19 August 2019 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68691120180 for <resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=JlMiepxl; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=UdL7gRin
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n42yaKvo5JcF for <resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D08712011E for <resolverless-dns@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 6597 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2019 17:07:49 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=19c2.5d5ad765.k1908; i=printer-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=DjjWkeBdGsWo4hU6LvBd0OdxCi4YF57HipUPaK/AD4U=; b=JlMiepxlw8NReiJYMJi0a2Hzvi4N3p5ZgrIaQL1LflDS6JJOsm3B9Ya7XSIJ5vrq4BFRENKHQiJsGk6Y71NY7TGfsUqOphoU4dZUZVNTXW/1m7kFlc/e0eLIQCTdZyVsL+SrRbEAmp4ZeuX8a/OtzrZ+3kTb7p820zy9o+Bru0EES6LKmjVcNNr5V9tcYYfTn1kv7vDy4Ku1TQj0dva+RxSHpk8e8OPyv6AyiDg7cYVauI9/BWlXn6hTT1cEjmpR
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=19c2.5d5ad765.k1908; olt=printer-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=DjjWkeBdGsWo4hU6LvBd0OdxCi4YF57HipUPaK/AD4U=; b=UdL7gRinnewVAm/2W0O+C2VQv9wXHIdixQqhTFpXvnuwoCnUxPJNZc6PDikMlUbuOJjCJHDPnqwDY/YNnxhR9KPZhNrpxU6HeR1rAwssRbsrUHpuQ/h7jFWusjJvYbQ26WXlqXZ2N/DnbsAtjDzbEJ06hR/5SCjJV7iGZzF9meKumizBTGSbFdLd4KJpYHc+7UVPcuQYGkr0RQzgP+kBPHRsc1h+rt3l18zjdM7rBuLtzP90qWjF5AHZFuqLyJcx
Received: from ary.qy ([64.246.232.221]) by imap.iecc.com ([64.57.183.75]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, printer@iecc.com) via TCP; 19 Aug 2019 17:07:49 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5AEF588004D; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:07:49 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:07:49 -0400
Message-Id: <20190819170749.5AEF588004D@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: resolverless-dns@ietf.org
Cc: ericorth@google.com
In-Reply-To: <CAMOjQcFmqs-s19nd+i-oeuq4+8zdWVihj6=oGnXC+YL50LxAtg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/resolverless-dns/ComdPCiT96PsAct80xYCwI4K650>
Subject: Re: [Resolverless-dns] Paper on Resolver-less DNS
X-BeenThere: resolverless-dns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Resolverless DNS <resolverless-dns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/resolverless-dns>, <mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/resolverless-dns/>
List-Post: <mailto:resolverless-dns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/resolverless-dns>, <mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:07:54 -0000

In article <CAMOjQcFmqs-s19nd+i-oeuq4+8zdWVihj6=oGnXC+YL50LxAtg@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>But that could still be very valuable.  If (and this is a big if) many
>recursive resolvers use this mechanism to state whether or not they do
>significant filtering, then for those that report that they do not, this
>becomes a strong signal to clients that resolverless DNS will not bypass
>any filtering.

I'm scratching my head trying to figure out why I would want to
configure my DNS resolver to tell random malware and PII stealing apps
what my filtering policy is.

R's,
John