[Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns

Justin Henck <henck@google.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 04:35 UTC

Return-Path: <henck@google.com>
X-Original-To: resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E957130E57 for <resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:35:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.945
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.945 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tAaETxaetv8L for <resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:35:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92c.google.com (mail-ua1-x92c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5B06130DD1 for <resolverless-dns@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:35:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92c.google.com with SMTP id v24so6735605uap.13 for <resolverless-dns@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:35:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2pukenmn4nO49iXEPGYF8VnHZU+ltlMS1++bBSFNJYE=; b=u1atTBLzoRsBwPPwpKlE4MN6kBOWsFtNji5yKUl5j4E4h8GV9UbRuE0LLAWS7ZorFI b1P+yxwAS8SuOjKcmM4XR8pBJyzquuWrQ1t4XYmtyGpC12MheQIuNRivSFSID8vlaEh2 Lrm1MGJwlJF20IJ7L+zHS/GifaFCfhjJDSk+i2KGyTdekxxgYZz7EMzJyUUld+zmOWZu Yko6A4da9jM349G0NELqFFKpesUm0RSbaiP3raKmJVj1nZIGe4o5L1LL2Z8vT2PzhIrU 1rb3x/LMhIKmrpmF1GCa8VIcVIz4VFrg2d8CYxzs+hh/1sbkWRLZQOrjCMhVlemJgkYJ c5hw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2pukenmn4nO49iXEPGYF8VnHZU+ltlMS1++bBSFNJYE=; b=kA4nnE5li8LL2+n8XfGl/wsJEQ6bE7Uck3etRqiBFRLydH3SCX0I89LENsmtzE79Tm gWm17//YI002aDWIILNkspwuBq8z6zH48pGMXHUAz2ko7jvUFFjvkBrBVF+EsxH+r7q+ fG9Toof9VizjQi6vRMNuxyFN0K4EbyhTWs1aA9mo/zQOo6OkHZKzQzs9YyoCUUPnMepy 5P0NWJuU+IQCJzWcy0BApUFV0xew1sFc16mehm5fZK63kBqvhV94DmiV6YQ91cMtxMyI TxCUzwhC0G9DcD9RxWgIApJ/Ag70G9nt7rZ0mzSaLgP4vH+tqXvAO3gSEBO3Go0YvHii uh7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJ0OXE4S30LZU5AVPL0BxxkGN8sbSttffFu9Uyi6Vgr0clLIN8X 61+uBSmnX0s0u2tFRfDggWZ2eA8z+t5RqoQnmNF7GmiBgSc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dlJH0AVtV3K39vMmUGUGdgeOlqaIHmxJuK+Yu6LUzu2XjQNFJIGHNNr4hFuP+O9Taf3Ix+KRXU2l9B3d+GynM=
X-Received: by 2002:a9f:386c:: with SMTP id q41mr1389349uad.27.1541651721404; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:35:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Justin Henck <henck@google.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:35:09 +0700
Message-ID: <CAN-AkJt=Oe5oO19Zu-fKqzHvTD5P4PcrGq8t8Hg3rNkUQxC8WA@mail.gmail.com>
To: resolverless-dns@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003942b3057a1fc38d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/resolverless-dns/b8R0A4im8HJmdIESlM1JQvErvvY>
Subject: [Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns
X-BeenThere: resolverless-dns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Resolverless DNS <resolverless-dns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/resolverless-dns>, <mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/resolverless-dns/>
List-Post: <mailto:resolverless-dns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/resolverless-dns>, <mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:35:26 -0000

Hi all,

Some people mentioned load-balancing concerns during the meeting.  Ben
Schwartz pointed out to me that if a potential solution included DNSSEC,
then the server would have to push an entire RRSET.  If we combine that
with random IP selection by clients and AltSvc to solve geographical
misdirection, would that alleviate load balancing concerns?

Justin

Justin Henck
Product Manager
212-565-9811
google.com/jigsaw

PGP: EA8E 8C27 2D75 974D B357 482B 1039 9F2D 869A 117B