[Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns
Justin Henck <henck@google.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 04:35 UTC
Return-Path: <henck@google.com>
X-Original-To: resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E957130E57
for <resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:35:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.945
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.945 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5,
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01,
USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id tAaETxaetv8L for <resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:35:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92c.google.com (mail-ua1-x92c.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5B06130DD1
for <resolverless-dns@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:35:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92c.google.com with SMTP id v24so6735605uap.13
for <resolverless-dns@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:35:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=2pukenmn4nO49iXEPGYF8VnHZU+ltlMS1++bBSFNJYE=;
b=u1atTBLzoRsBwPPwpKlE4MN6kBOWsFtNji5yKUl5j4E4h8GV9UbRuE0LLAWS7ZorFI
b1P+yxwAS8SuOjKcmM4XR8pBJyzquuWrQ1t4XYmtyGpC12MheQIuNRivSFSID8vlaEh2
Lrm1MGJwlJF20IJ7L+zHS/GifaFCfhjJDSk+i2KGyTdekxxgYZz7EMzJyUUld+zmOWZu
Yko6A4da9jM349G0NELqFFKpesUm0RSbaiP3raKmJVj1nZIGe4o5L1LL2Z8vT2PzhIrU
1rb3x/LMhIKmrpmF1GCa8VIcVIz4VFrg2d8CYxzs+hh/1sbkWRLZQOrjCMhVlemJgkYJ
c5hw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=2pukenmn4nO49iXEPGYF8VnHZU+ltlMS1++bBSFNJYE=;
b=kA4nnE5li8LL2+n8XfGl/wsJEQ6bE7Uck3etRqiBFRLydH3SCX0I89LENsmtzE79Tm
gWm17//YI002aDWIILNkspwuBq8z6zH48pGMXHUAz2ko7jvUFFjvkBrBVF+EsxH+r7q+
fG9Toof9VizjQi6vRMNuxyFN0K4EbyhTWs1aA9mo/zQOo6OkHZKzQzs9YyoCUUPnMepy
5P0NWJuU+IQCJzWcy0BApUFV0xew1sFc16mehm5fZK63kBqvhV94DmiV6YQ91cMtxMyI
TxCUzwhC0G9DcD9RxWgIApJ/Ag70G9nt7rZ0mzSaLgP4vH+tqXvAO3gSEBO3Go0YvHii
uh7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJ0OXE4S30LZU5AVPL0BxxkGN8sbSttffFu9Uyi6Vgr0clLIN8X
61+uBSmnX0s0u2tFRfDggWZ2eA8z+t5RqoQnmNF7GmiBgSc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dlJH0AVtV3K39vMmUGUGdgeOlqaIHmxJuK+Yu6LUzu2XjQNFJIGHNNr4hFuP+O9Taf3Ix+KRXU2l9B3d+GynM=
X-Received: by 2002:a9f:386c:: with SMTP id q41mr1389349uad.27.1541651721404;
Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:35:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Justin Henck <henck@google.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:35:09 +0700
Message-ID: <CAN-AkJt=Oe5oO19Zu-fKqzHvTD5P4PcrGq8t8Hg3rNkUQxC8WA@mail.gmail.com>
To: resolverless-dns@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003942b3057a1fc38d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/resolverless-dns/b8R0A4im8HJmdIESlM1JQvErvvY>
Subject: [Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns
X-BeenThere: resolverless-dns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Resolverless DNS <resolverless-dns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/resolverless-dns>,
<mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/resolverless-dns/>
List-Post: <mailto:resolverless-dns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/resolverless-dns>,
<mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:35:26 -0000
Hi all, Some people mentioned load-balancing concerns during the meeting. Ben Schwartz pointed out to me that if a potential solution included DNSSEC, then the server would have to push an entire RRSET. If we combine that with random IP selection by clients and AltSvc to solve geographical misdirection, would that alleviate load balancing concerns? Justin Justin Henck Product Manager 212-565-9811 google.com/jigsaw PGP: EA8E 8C27 2D75 974D B357 482B 1039 9F2D 869A 117B
- [Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns Justin Henck
- Re: [Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns Dave Lawrence
- Re: [Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns manu tman
- Re: [Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns Dave Lawrence
- Re: [Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns manu tman
- Re: [Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns Justin Henck
- Re: [Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns Jim Reid
- Re: [Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns Justin Henck
- Re: [Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns Dave Lawrence
- Re: [Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns Dave Lawrence
- Re: [Resolverless-dns] Load-balancing concerns Justin Henck