Re: [Resolverless-dns] Paper on Resolver-less DNS

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Tue, 20 August 2019 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0DA1200A3 for <resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 14:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dueEc2RP-AoN for <resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 14:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1230A120059 for <resolverless-dns@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 14:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux-9daj.localnet (vixp1.redbarn.org [24.104.150.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E78B6892E8; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 21:12:53 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
To: resolverless-dns@ietf.org, sy@informatik.uni-hamburg.de
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 21:12:53 +0000
Message-ID: <4568720.uvMTqBdgP4@linux-9daj>
Organization: none
In-Reply-To: <a725a1d4-b57d-2dfb-9659-bf595a0141d1@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
References: <CAHbrMsBhR1yaLxQk7wZk54Jdf5nvkS03KC3UTae0Famu2+SV8g@mail.gmail.com> <4912129.Q1cc77n183@linux-9daj> <a725a1d4-b57d-2dfb-9659-bf595a0141d1@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/resolverless-dns/oiy_Rj1632Aco4HYLIBbMOvMLc8>
Subject: Re: [Resolverless-dns] Paper on Resolver-less DNS
X-BeenThere: resolverless-dns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Resolverless DNS <resolverless-dns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/resolverless-dns>, <mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/resolverless-dns/>
List-Post: <mailto:resolverless-dns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/resolverless-dns>, <mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 21:12:56 -0000

On Tuesday, 20 August 2019 21:10:01 UTC Erik Sy wrote:
> ...
> I'm aware of DNSSEC and DANE and their deployment issues. In total, I'm
> still missing the evidence you claimed to have on clients validating DNS
> records retrieved from traditional DNS resolver.

that's moving of goalposts; i won't follow.

> I assume that by
> referring to DNSSEC and DANE, you do not want to claim that some popular
> client software is strictly enforcing a validation of DNS records using
> DNSSEC and DANE, right?

caching resolvers everywhere, do this. the economy depends on them doing so. 
if RDNS isn't client software from your point of view, you'll dismiss these 
assertions.

> ...
> 
> You may have noticed that I'm also giving a talk at the elbsides shorly
> after yours. Thus, it will be easy for us to meet each other there.

that's great!

-- 
Paul