[rfc-dist] Moved to Historic: RFC 5469 on DES and IDEA Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Tue, 02 February 2021 05:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2381A3A1A34 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 21:28:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VDHKrYJ6bckR for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 21:28:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 900A73A1836 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 21:27:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6FBF40773; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 21:27:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7F8D6F40773; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 21:27:15 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20210202052715.7F8D6F40773@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 21:27:15 -0800
Subject: [rfc-dist] Moved to Historic: RFC 5469 on DES and IDEA Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: tls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-dist <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

RFC 5469 has been reclassified as Historic.

        
        RFC 5469

        Title:      DES and IDEA Cipher Suites 
                    for Transport Layer Security (TLS) 
        Author:     P. Eronen, Ed.
        Status:     Historic
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       February 2009
        Pages:      4
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-tls-des-idea-02.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5469

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC5469

Transport Layer Security (TLS) versions 1.0 (RFC 2246) and 1.1 (RFC
4346) include cipher suites based on DES (Data Encryption Standard)
and IDEA (International Data Encryption Algorithm) algorithms.  DES
(when used in single-DES mode) and IDEA are no longer recommended for
general use in TLS, and have been removed from TLS version 1.2 (RFC
5246).  This document specifies these cipher suites for completeness
and discusses reasons why their use is no longer recommended.  

This document is a product of the Transport Layer Security Working Group of the IETF.


HISTORIC: This memo defines a Historic Document for the Internet
community.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org