[rfc-dist] BCP 232, RFC 8932 on Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service Operators

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Fri, 23 October 2020 21:45 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C1A3A0112 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VacmZuBICAaf for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8D73A08B8 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F524F4071A; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id BFFCFF4071A; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20201023214546.BFFCFF4071A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:45:46 -0700
Subject: [rfc-dist] BCP 232, RFC 8932 on Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service Operators
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dns-privacy@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-dist <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        BCP 232        
        RFC 8932

        Title:      Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service 
                    Operators 
        Author:     S. Dickinson,
                    B. Overeinder,
                    R. van Rijswijk-Deij,
                    A. Mankin
        Status:     Best Current Practice
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       October 2020
        Mailbox:    sara@sinodun.com, 
                    benno@NLnetLabs.nl, 
                    roland@nlnetlabs.nl,
                    allison.mankin@gmail.com
        Pages:      34
        See Also:   BCP 232

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-14.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8932

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8932

This document presents operational, policy, and security
considerations for DNS recursive resolver operators who choose to
offer DNS privacy services.  With these recommendations, the operator
can make deliberate decisions regarding which services to provide, as
well as understanding how those decisions and the alternatives impact
the privacy of users. 

This document also presents a non-normative framework to assist
writers of a Recursive operator Privacy Statement, analogous to DNS
Security Extensions (DNSSEC) Policies and DNSSEC Practice Statements
described in RFC 6841.

This document is a product of the DNS PRIVate Exchange Working Group of the IETF.


BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for 
improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org