[rfc-dist] RFC 8593 on Video Traffic Models for RTP Congestion Control Evaluations

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Wed, 15 May 2019 01:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800C3120296 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 18:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWbg0ShuLgmz for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 18:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F70F1202BC for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 18:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A55B81DC9; Tue, 14 May 2019 18:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8B524B81DC2; Tue, 14 May 2019 18:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20190515013518.8B524B81DC2@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 18:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8593_on_Video_Traffic_Models_for_RTP_Co?= =?utf-8?q?ngestion_Control_Evaluations?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rmcat@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8593

        Title:      Video Traffic Models for RTP 
                    Congestion Control Evaluations 
        Author:     X. Zhu, 
                    S. Mena,
                    Z. Sarker
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       May 2019
        Mailbox:    xiaoqzhu@cisco.com, 
                    semena@cisco.com, 
                    Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com
        Pages:      19
        Characters: 44193
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-rmcat-video-traffic-model-07.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8593

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8593

This document describes two reference video traffic models for
evaluating RTP congestion control algorithms.  The first model
statistically characterizes the behavior of a live video encoder in
response to changing requests on the target video rate.  The second
model is trace-driven and emulates the output of actual encoded video
frame sizes from a high-resolution test sequence.  Both models are
designed to strike a balance between simplicity, repeatability, and
authenticity in modeling the interactions between a live video
traffic source and the congestion control module.  Finally, the
document describes how both approaches can be combined into a hybrid
model.

This document is a product of the RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques Working Group of the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org