[rfc-dist] RFC 9070 on YANG Data Model for MPLS LDP

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Mon, 14 March 2022 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCC23A0BED for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vJx_sVohb_j9 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CF1A3A0933 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F21FAE8B; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 64A113511A; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, mpls@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20220314224605.64A113511A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:46:05 -0700
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 9070 on YANG Data Model for MPLS LDP
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-dist <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 9070

        Title:      YANG Data Model for MPLS LDP 
        Author:     K. Raza, Ed.,
                    R. Asati,
                    X. Liu,
                    S. Esale,
                    X. Chen,
                    H. Shah
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       March 2022
        Mailbox:    skraza@cisco.com,
                    rajiva@cisco.com,
                    xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com,
                    santosh_easale@berkeley.edu,
                    jescia.chenxia@huawei.com,
                    hshah@ciena.com
        Pages:      79
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-09.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9070

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC9070

This document describes a YANG data model for the Multiprotocol Label
Switching (MPLS) Label Distribution Protocol (LDP). The model also
serves as the base model to define the Multipoint LDP (mLDP) model. 

The YANG modules in this document conform to the Network Management
Datastore Architecture (NMDA).

This document is a product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org