[rfc-dist] RFC 9229 on IPv4 Routes with an IPv6 Next Hop in the Babel Routing Protocol

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Fri, 06 May 2022 18:15 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88211C15E6F6; Fri, 6 May 2022 11:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651860934; bh=KC9YfabODGF5RQvzA6VyVfKCdWU24w8NtbRnGtfmw28=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=wf/5l/A6wbCmSdBl1ccc1fmoffcJNuF1oxvWuwU1l/7+0BslV0jfluxIH4/myuAp9 9f0YwCBm7OOCuFHwmZF6FqPwFMfBHLak+WAfMxi2C2W1Ns8asvkkKV3Sx0xxMbRoVT T/f0+WOgPxlRT+Ffhv96/XmFSQxR59mU+zFhjTcY=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri May 6 11:15:34 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A987C157B55; Fri, 6 May 2022 11:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651860934; bh=KC9YfabODGF5RQvzA6VyVfKCdWU24w8NtbRnGtfmw28=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=wf/5l/A6wbCmSdBl1ccc1fmoffcJNuF1oxvWuwU1l/7+0BslV0jfluxIH4/myuAp9 9f0YwCBm7OOCuFHwmZF6FqPwFMfBHLak+WAfMxi2C2W1Ns8asvkkKV3Sx0xxMbRoVT T/f0+WOgPxlRT+Ffhv96/XmFSQxR59mU+zFhjTcY=
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E88C15948D; Fri, 6 May 2022 11:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.645
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D4a7qybhdAyJ; Fri, 6 May 2022 11:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85BDBC157B37; Fri, 6 May 2022 11:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 63F1A8DED5; Fri, 6 May 2022 11:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, babel@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20220506181529.63F1A8DED5@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 11:15:29 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-dist/odO17HPI8loY645bEIsQlqIWPiw>
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 9229 on IPv4 Routes with an IPv6 Next Hop in the Babel Routing Protocol
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-dist <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 9229

        Title:      IPv4 Routes with an IPv6 
                    Next Hop in the Babel Routing Protocol 
        Author:     J. Chroboczek
        Status:     Experimental
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       May 2022
        Mailbox:    jch@irif.fr
        Pages:      9
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-08.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9229

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC9229

This document defines an extension to the Babel routing protocol that
allows announcing routes to an IPv4 prefix with an IPv6 next hop,
which makes it possible for IPv4 traffic to flow through interfaces
that have not been assigned an IPv4 address.

This document is a product of the Babel routing protocol Working Group of the IETF.


EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the
Internet community.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any
kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org