[rfc-i] SVG document - stray text

[Lee.Howard at charter.com (Howard, Lee L)]

Thanks for clarifying, I'm OK with going to AUTH48 then. 

Lee

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 27, 2016, at 5:51 PM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) <rse at rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Lee,
> 
> Not as such. We did last call/community comment several months ago. It's
> just taken a while to incorporate the comments. The question before the
> IAB now is whether we captured the comments sufficiently such that the
> IAB is willing to approve these for publication (noting that all the
> documents will be going through a -bis cycle after we finish coding and
> incorporating what we've learned from real-life implementation).
> 
> -Heather
> 
>> On 7/27/16 2:42 PM, Howard, Lee L wrote:
>> I think right now it looks like nobody on the IAB read it. So I think it'd be embarrassing to send it for last call as is.  That's where we are now, right?
>> 
>> Lee
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>>> On Jul 27, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) <rse at rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 7/27/16 7:32 AM, Howard, Lee L wrote:
>>>> Before we send for further comment, the Abstract in draft-iab-rfc-02 has
>>>> stray text in the opening words:
>>>> 
>>>> .  Maybe the text in section 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iab-svg-rfc-02
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I wouldn't want to announce without cleaning that up.
>>> Hi Lee,
>>> 
>>> Is this something we can clean up during AUTH48, or do you want it fixed
>>> before the IAB does it's final approval for publication?
>>> 
>>> -Heather
>