IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839C9129D94 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:42:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e38qEiOkqkoD for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:42:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 859A6129464 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:33:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457F9B8021F; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:33:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DE8B8021C for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:33:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5x7eb-2c1zSJ for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:33:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EAF7B8021F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:33:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id x190so256221268qkb.0 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:33:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Yc1FVIGS7g2MHeR++DvRWwfiLBAACd1+HP1M375Ygs0=; b=C2Fx0ytyrpuG2Os8cxBv2ZzMVDeMo+E2l6xuVsbBtoMS3pmBbkTjPKgsFaYsyRrRYX AtmdisL/MpoMXG4KOBgsBX+BkuF0DSmmNwmeF0jiqqpfu67KDP00EIGJ0Eo9cmfX+Jn9 Gm8fufK+qO+SPKOzGr4VFd2b8hUTig+nnC61mS7Ro+YHjy+MQ2/EIHqIDPJF5W2ZZlCb 4lQnBOq5cLnnAAQNA57e7kQW9nLLtlXCp00tWipk4vHc5jcznokZxS+/gsNW5yWEh+UR vO4O84QCLTk8HxwH++GvdtKAKgMp1rYbnQiT12NiTbLCEkrcDhE1mdX7JOUlfYW11cNX JA7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Yc1FVIGS7g2MHeR++DvRWwfiLBAACd1+HP1M375Ygs0=; b=CvMsQLUKllqTcyayzhI+guYcn/UaOZK6b2GestWF/9H6VxuLZ9guUrm/UKKFwmdDXX nnFG2zDbNnTgxDhhBRt+XJiBuNdXLGNHbkrrVKp3f9V+c9bs4rVeczi5IIVZz9M43aik YV4Ks4VSsSjlPpQQgAqkimbYmaZ72kjDXuVoYvumfi5hi+F4yd3bonvx+gC5h6rPeVT+ dlefIQRBNuyJqowlSSO4w1APYVHcGVfVV+4NYccaEk+B64zakqNkS4hLKpnjr31tjp3t VPbaAFjEP/pFKrYnfBwilUf6h/f7jxHteXRmrofrfYyXf2NKnL4hvhpAjGNoo5m+7NOI /vQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00DgvVTIPKxSGFKldmUqrDPNrBPc3yx6yJ0NY5f9JMvUxV8E0ReJ3nypf2QFi4xDA==
X-Received: by 10.55.120.195 with SMTP id t186mr34272827qkc.218.1480620822382; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:33:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.20.218] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s41sm820516qtc.39.2016.12.01.11.33.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:33:41 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:33:40 -0500
Message-Id: <C7939204-0B34-41EE-B3AD-F5C8D06506C2@fugue.com>
References: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org>
To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

This looks good.   I submitted some comments in the github tracker.   Dunno if I’m right about any of the comments, but hopefully they do more harm than good. :)

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email