IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Update on the CSS - second round

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 21 February 2017 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79FA120725 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:54:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ujqh2QJZ3H6B for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F72A120724 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6C6B8019A; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:54:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35705B80199 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:54:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ttkH7X9978xF for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:54:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22a.google.com (mail-qt0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22a]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3AB8B8019A for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id x35so50900168qtc.2 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:54:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=FaUfuifPfL1YWT6cze/XQPaMpbkYZ4PvEZubr6RGVsE=; b=JFSfGPtowv4o7aJflyiLULJo9298Cj/lIGo3XYFUapjmaG2K1wMS5WerVS4kr5YTV8 0xiGEglXFYK3mckPOTSOnRl3Mh8l/Uq9rIYWrpfV5FA2/Z1nDCVxx5BLpB3ff5/dSz1z MkBno8YsBHFB2+EUtJfF5dOiNtF5BO5oRv/RCx6rURGJSSYJ+n1z2WXoWKsM3aqglSHl BXk7UPrWgjiPjB8L3vnp+VOJ7hBEiQDCUYlDkZ0QtvDRnnMGxI4kHvvFbgANlmJNXk6m pV5c+j6yt6nrX/D6HWKPrQdVJ2VE5QdITUo9NnZ2bwTQQ88hdonuPk7Qdb5sgvxGyRmB GYhQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=FaUfuifPfL1YWT6cze/XQPaMpbkYZ4PvEZubr6RGVsE=; b=ugj3VPCgzLOTpN1IIZmGbgwzWi+0p03d9UGZ2zm6P69zU+vmyHJDfwJojN1njJBS35 /bEy8cOcV2HDaVjIImG6rLcA17/oLNd4P+33NxzdxXK8qNhb2av0l+I74XYbyRPH+83f FH9Czj5l7xX1vckUmcWbdnSprsbyKwmwGZTCJ/q6Qk5F4+KZqzn258k56L39UPvXEBLA ++yBJVrakhKUdaH9/1X11+jwjm1UqgPfiPP5d83BT3Or5SlQas1pgof8vWOmyDBmm88k mV0GLkx1sRKCP9vtkpC5VxV9i6YDTF4HwbqDrfTzk9i+eCXC3Tm9rcMWOZ0s44l4pGcW kK8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nWBLKU9eSXQBrxvmDoOPZpUbLgqRb71+LfwWuGMwt6dcJ33HY0HAtAfIqhWPxmGA==
X-Received: by 10.237.55.97 with SMTP id i88mr29492733qtb.143.1487717666246; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:54:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z139sm4152363qkb.29.2017.02.21.14.54.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:54:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <19619CFC-F897-4EF3-8026-2EEBB4D2A800@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:54:23 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU2xuVEr5paPn3uHteKyxDerNbQ+Bo+jvfy=mMTBftdx_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
References: <ecad592d-2123-bf84-6c6e-22531136afd7@rfc-editor.org> <013D3DF8-3AB6-4E00-9456-6EF82D961DA3@fugue.com> <CAA=duU2xuVEr5paPn3uHteKyxDerNbQ+Bo+jvfy=mMTBftdx_w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Update on the CSS - second round
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1220658232783570959=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On Feb 21, 2017, at 5:34 PM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> wrote:
> The behavior may be browser-specific. In Firefox on a Mac, I found that scrolling the TOC using the scroll bar or arrow keys would be completely confined to the TOC. If I used two-finger scrolling, an initial scroll would be confined to the TOC, even if I did a big flick to get to the end, and I then had to do a completely separate scroll operation to start the main text scrolling, with the cursor still in the TOC.

I'm using Chrome on Sierra, and using the trackpad to scroll.


_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email