[rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "B.2 Anchors and IDs"

[paul.hoffman at vpnc.org (Paul Hoffman)]

On 11 May 2016, at 8:13, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 2016-05-11 16:15, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> On 10 May 2016, at 21:30, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>>> On 2016-05-11 01:52, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>> +1 to the request. I don't see a "need" to anchor in non-block 
>>>> text, nor
>>>> to obscure blocks.
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> I'm asking for consistency - why have @anchor in thead and tbody 
>>> then?
>>
>> Because they are block-y elements, yes?
>
> But are they non-obscure?

Correct.

> What we have right now doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Why can I 
> link to <thead>, but not to a <note>?

Because to some of us a <note> is obscure. Could you send a specific 
list of changes you want, sometime soon? If not, we can certainly 
revisit this in a later version of the vocabulary.

--Paul Hoffman