[rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.56.3 "border" Attribute"
julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke) Tue, 05 April 2016 17:31 UTC
From: julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke)
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:31:34 +0200
Subject: [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.56.3 "border" Attribute"
In-Reply-To: <5703CF1A.605@gmx.de>
References: <5703CF1A.605@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <5703F676.4050908@gmx.de>
On 2016-04-05 16:43, Julian Reschke wrote: > <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-iab-xml2rfc-03.html#rfc.section.2.56.3>: > > > "The width of the border for this cell. The default is 0, meaning no > border." > > What is the unit? CSS pixels? > > Related to that: V2 allows table styles using > <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7749.html#element.texttable.attribute.style>: > > >> Selects which borders should be drawn, where >> >> "all" means borders around all table cells, >> "full" is like "all", except no horizontal lines between table >> rows (except below the column titles), >> "headers" adds just a separator between column titles and rows, and >> "none" means no borders at all. > > Is there a mapping of "full" and "headers" to V3 syntax? > > Best regards, Julian Statistics from AUTH48 XML (insert standard disclaimer): style=full 1185 (also the default) style=all 28 style=headers 40 style=empty 27 So styles other than the default style are used in practice, but not a lot. That being said, I'd be surprised if people wouldn't want similar kind of control once we can actually produce non-ugly tables... Best regards, Julian
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.56.3 "border" At… Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.56.3 "border" At… Julian Reschke