IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] CORRECTED RE: Handling of large code sections ...

Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> Wed, 25 May 2022 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38126C07AF9A for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 14:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653515507; bh=bj23sFM0otUCkItMXelKHtt1Glvi/ltrHwkIsjge8XA=; h=From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=DmUXVazbAl4izUQOQIYscd/l1WsdzwR2UA8BqgPiKedXIyxE3oiZrYvMGQXskIy2Z 96dxwVZTd+el1CHAyKKj6aSwXUTkRBAC8h5k39oFwA32ICbeCdvYWmogRUOqrZHU3v V0bPebn+oYvYwcD3uEeSgpo+QpwXpUTqpynT2Kqg=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed May 25 14:51:47 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA868C07B7BD; Wed, 25 May 2022 14:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653515507; bh=bj23sFM0otUCkItMXelKHtt1Glvi/ltrHwkIsjge8XA=; h=From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=DmUXVazbAl4izUQOQIYscd/l1WsdzwR2UA8BqgPiKedXIyxE3oiZrYvMGQXskIy2Z 96dxwVZTd+el1CHAyKKj6aSwXUTkRBAC8h5k39oFwA32ICbeCdvYWmogRUOqrZHU3v V0bPebn+oYvYwcD3uEeSgpo+QpwXpUTqpynT2Kqg=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE5CC07B7A2 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 14:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pFpkdvWMX6eX for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 14:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfx.amsl.com (ietfx.amsl.com [50.223.129.196]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 601BDC1D34F1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 May 2022 14:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfx.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5447341AFDF0; Wed, 25 May 2022 14:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from ietfx.amsl.com ([50.223.129.196]) by localhost (ietfx.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id imNgmzi_Xtf8; Wed, 25 May 2022 14:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (host-92-27-125-209.static.as13285.net [92.27.125.209]) by ietfx.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C674F404C4CA; Wed, 25 May 2022 14:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\))
From: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB3757A5453DC664D0EA92CF34B9D69@MN2PR11MB3757.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 22:51:40 +0100
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <33779818-0FEA-4949-BCA4-C5977E6F910A@ietf.org>
References: <MN2PR11MB3757A5453DC664D0EA92CF34B9D69@MN2PR11MB3757.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Paul Duffy (paduffy)" <paduffy=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.80.82.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/2sSqTEQOqdmAaOJ2JwBrXTrU2Fg>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] CORRECTED RE: Handling of large code sections ...
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hi Paul

Can you achieve what you want using the "src" attribute of the <sourcecode> element, which points to an external URI? 

	https://authors.ietf.org/en/rfcxml-vocabulary#src-2

I don’t know if this is supported on author-tools given the potential issues but it will work locally.

cheersJay


> On 25 May 2022, at 22:17, Paul Duffy (paduffy) <paduffy=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
>  
>  
> From: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org> On Behalf Of Paul Duffy (paduffy)
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 5:15 PM
> To: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
> Subject: [rfc-i] Handling of large code sections ...
>  
> Folks
>  
> Is it acceptable for a draft to externally reference large sections of code (say, parked in Github) versus inlining into the draft?  The FORMER makes for easy access and input into the code’s respective tool chain, versus messy cut/paste of the LATTER.
>  
> Cheers
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
exec-director@ietf.org

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email