Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section & tools

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 16 July 2020 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5838A3A0A82; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B5fkqEsDNhB1; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF33A3A0A84; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8069F40760; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3C6F40760 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3VOQj5miLMLF for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0E2BF4075E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1594922582; bh=/1mojUmeI9ZQj76FJvSxPZHtUO5p3G02X4fEUvowAyk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=DNFiZ3DD2w+Px4eof1SzV2Iw+YCw3e5fXuDVc6qSo3S8dehaa8GuTfWNVRHZzhzSB TTZWr3sgB7xYr7Nyaa6fqCKhThyMtuttaMRwJRIBsK/Z6+aFWwYuV9yKgZQeqhXsYX 1BJDbjrJJjoZSc0W0fnecGi0VlyTUtQyv8QVjkJM=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.182] ([91.61.50.86]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M4s0t-1jy3EH0OyV-0021Zp; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 20:03:02 +0200
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <7c0eeb4-f21-c797-f523-b2724952b013@taugh.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <436b0489-9b74-985c-8f54-7a6de410cca2@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 20:03:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7c0eeb4-f21-c797-f523-b2724952b013@taugh.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:+JLsVlCpYYovCK3clmfgswnx95zNEcJMOt2ncptZgL6fqJHnHM3 Z7Dn9CUNwOliDdDf6LIRb5KbP9NKIPnPtNeVR5jSq+K/CcPKay2dVfafus9TsRFRhQqzJ/I n5HzVqaM/l+rn7IaTYniiQKtneAdoH+Bl/1kZSkBJcsNx1q7DuygT4OIWUxAdmtVMGUlW3m 6ESK3gp2vR3Uo9/DXKBWg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:El4ouJZN8TY=:nGzjllcU+WJja8zyMnpZe0 ZP/7ijS948XQftCTOEEjLByt64D8N1jkuoP0VKACu+p3wC1TINavFJakrwULkAtn3wjLRti0x VmkJ+tggkU/vFCrk8FY65FMsMQjAWnlZrVDn7MXuIgRqTUN4vVgXhafqHhIoA1bXEayKpjHWt W3h9OU5M789q8C0Jr7pq8eT1ml8fUkS9aCLQie7E9Mx8irnv3vwO6yt+We+2NzJzw66MfnjEp DB/oePUchNDo6+difUHV+kWf9wQpFgakqIe5T/dRJlTF5O79rVxeEIadoiRyfEdckxz3ApugO iCFDGS6r6bSjH1P4hsWSTBT1DRtqASBPdG9Z8+9pwYJv8XqzszN56Rsk0u2/F+K+3OKfSbgB+ oB4u03QdtjifB0KdgIQd5nMSNcsuiu3tzi0yPQzDIeUbiWU5dL4De2wdpvk4kinC7wXreyOuy 94wAo2QQUuId6ufcNZfjrkfEziyfJkR7k4r3X+bhfKs7I16WPPSyvz6P14yZ2qFdG78sOo8mG LpPclITrlt5F8kNtA1TUfW1sTBsgO7H1E4mInrjmqddPnq/d4FOLbL47Kj6cO4ewdEVhjYbVY 7p1T0pchBc9L/Uk0zprchqUtTtPUrNmwhoYYa/cHXQsDFlZB5y3LQ5ldzf7reoOUL5oeWFkSn wubY33srIxStr6m/jwV8CMRulU1ToE5M6i8X11q2teQ2H7SZaA1YS99WxDDnTKHfaB1ORnWvo 7t0C8Pr1z+Ugjp4XXNDKWxnsJwPG6alp8AGuJdqjRHzzExMdGxSAKxsNY4VLRSP+2k23Q4pEP KORL27UHKO6wBIyGptuo4lyDJOm/8GNjqcl9AaeBYLH9S11HAE8bxhARka6PSpVaQk784zulH 0w4ETRfo3ZL/zxCvkxj758fT1624iekviS2tkXPMl2DaTapeoQR7ok6HzSDszJKAp+oWw30qf L9CXvSiXkjqbWCyU5/Zg9/6fxw/iQP6aLkAYefyHLUEXMNwWy80V/RVRmoJJzciIFFD6uNEk5 X9u4Cm2uJoNbG3G2hSNj4QtGABb65ucXdI+6VQose+phAsdG0lJf1GxhggU9p3jEzVqMmk5+Y NuxVchYJWAu5mzbnEjrG8XOJG/aGR3YLkKQq7UF7gyrYkzu9JaBR4xYaeggGmcC0Bs5dh9fk9 iX5p450Q+563fQc8uiW1jlav/DDCtXTpXEfY35XnxddKEJUfQSc2/vDRovwzX5L16wpv09xmK H0WJP/7bdBMR4suSq4+jCLxYfKUgOayU5nEQGVg==
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section & tools
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 16.07.2020 18:16, John R Levine wrote:
> In article <20200716013048.GB35840@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
> you write:
>>
>> Nice. Who'd know v3 had undocumented features ;-))
>
> Way too many.  The actual grammar used in published RFCs is here:
>
> https://github.com/rfc-format/v3grammar
>
> There are five versions, each intended to be backward compatible with
> the previous ones.
> ...

Well, we could (a) publish the updated RFC7991bis draft, and (b) try to
get more people involved into revising it.

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest