IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML (fwd)

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 25 May 2022 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA64C26E8BD for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 08:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653494201; bh=qYGQ+OP+BMsMI8lxuY879l4+yKQaGns7ZU/z4p8oIO0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=g4l45ov539HJxHdSkZ8tWUi65FCXqc/nAqm9ATYlVvrDFcKdzteOVhYRdZYn55RWW Ijgki3lrX2KrEuqo/2z8K4c7j1Zk0Vq+I2l12483EfxDAtulNOV4YUDk0THQIUjk9M lys7mx8VF3J1GQGlcRabW8Ohiijx6zbmwHiQoazI=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed May 25 08:56:41 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A909CC26D456; Wed, 25 May 2022 08:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653494201; bh=qYGQ+OP+BMsMI8lxuY879l4+yKQaGns7ZU/z4p8oIO0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=g4l45ov539HJxHdSkZ8tWUi65FCXqc/nAqm9ATYlVvrDFcKdzteOVhYRdZYn55RWW Ijgki3lrX2KrEuqo/2z8K4c7j1Zk0Vq+I2l12483EfxDAtulNOV4YUDk0THQIUjk9M lys7mx8VF3J1GQGlcRabW8Ohiijx6zbmwHiQoazI=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BE8C26D456 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 08:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=b8GX9GqT; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Gc3Y6YE0
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dkz_fnY3tAdZ for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 08:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53D3CC1B929E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 May 2022 08:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 88066 invoked from network); 25 May 2022 15:55:54 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; s=15800.628e518a.k2205; bh=naSBYIYbacMjwcQN/+pc/gyv4T/bOQaYgzx4TCiDosw=; b=b8GX9GqTDcbGgrUL6pIMZrmO68IrAIepbfIXmuUtLILSB8mnbCWyF4YrR/0Yb1n2VzaGII3CYfe26HrxPY7g8YPVcCmOtSuhYXlreMum8TpPjySxKx/DwZXI4Is+lkbsv+BcVKTy4x7vBfOkezWgJUPQXp7RjAUBSS/QD1eAHcqscn764a6Eow99EqBMFe6Yd8vi5s5u6f4mZjTsdBO9sUP+28PON1exGPYQJFusK5/NWagiLWlNrXYjdcfbDhMwnGQ84OdhYo5U8O/dN82HI2i3mHmbCqVvEgHb6s0JuKv5WsdHeskQWw1sq4RVy9HLn509n6KbPoIIcyA5+oKfrQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; s=15800.628e518a.k2205; bh=naSBYIYbacMjwcQN/+pc/gyv4T/bOQaYgzx4TCiDosw=; b=Gc3Y6YE0vyVKAph0SPki5AlvaYWEAV9r3m3ynkpksVzLHG8MlUZNWVTJbVX/P0SHhS8jIV2pSc5Cgh1PkyywE01vciuhm5dOkigP74+2s33q/qG8AZ/2uVwvOE3ZEgi6LN742jmRbTZYEFdAgDzDUCzVS02Z4y8Gf50p7aigxDdINvN4dqQ+TNeJlWxagWxqsbtxEshSCKEG61Gh1Jza+DFpN7yb37xcWyu7J2joWdHpy8/9YJcx0ekjZQajZMcsCveWtQGqSr0D3T/rvnJuO2f1D/rvUn/WSUB/3/lTnsJPFqYJ3lZNABISLnwHBKiZkTtNNeOD9rKtaJsIgu54Qw==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 25 May 2022 15:55:53 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 864D341A07A1; Wed, 25 May 2022 11:55:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E87E41A076B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 May 2022 11:55:52 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 11:55:52 -0400
Message-ID: <c91bf111-8bb1-d88c-4f58-63fded330c9f@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/3Qw28FmKHhzhSxCe-krHlupuvps>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML (fwd)
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> said
> Yes and yes, personally

> If we like the OG tags, should I arrange to add them to the HTMLized versions of pre-XML RFCs?

Bonus question: should I add the tags to the RFC info pages?  For me the 
answer is yes since that's where we encourage people to point.  I'll see 
about mocking something up.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email